e political success or to idealize the men who win wealth and honours
through
civil war. The history of this age is highly co
y computed, from the winning of sole power by the last of the dynasts
through
the War of Actium, from the ostensible restoratio
he individuals and classes that have gained wealth, honours and power
through
revolution emerge as champions of ordered governm
cision, he chose Caesar, his personal friend; and with Caesar he went
through
the wars from the passage of the Rubicon to the l
h to be regretted that he did not carry his History of the Civil Wars
through
the period of the Triumvirate to the War of Actiu
cracy. Yet the old framework and categories subsist: a monarchy rules
through
an oligarchy. Subject and treatment indicated,
These men ruled, as did the Senate, not in virtue of written law, but
through
auctoritas; and the name of principes civitatis c
ught the farms of small peasants, encroached upon public land, seized
through
mortgages the ancestral property of senators, and
to secure fair treatment for provincials or reform in the Roman State
through
the re-establishment of the peasant farmer. Among
were the most important. Through alliance with groups of financiers,
through
patronage exercised in the law-courts and ties of
eminence both when a consul and when a consular, or senior statesman,
through
lack of family- connexions and clientela. Withi
PageBook=>017 Sulla prevailed and settled order at Rome again
through
violence and bloodshed. Sulla decimated the knigh
ly reduced in political power in the previous generation, not so much
through
Marius as from internal disasters and the rise of
in eastern warfare under Sulla and highly trusted by him, led armies
through
Asia and shattered the power of Mithridates. Comb
Lucullus, proconsul of Macedonia, carried the arms of Rome in victory
through
Thrace to the shore of Pontus and the mouth of th
arbus, the cousin of Catulus, a young man early prominent in politics
through
the great estates in Italy and the clientela amon
us). PageBook=>025 to few at Rome to achieve distinction, save
through
the questionable and hazardous means of the tribu
ecay, largely by help from C. Marius, strained every nerve and effort
through
long years of political intrigue to maintain the
cked fear or scruple. Contending against two of the principes, he won
through
bribery and popular favour the paramount office i
y (Livy, Per. 75). 4 A great extension of the corn-dole was carried
through
by Cato in 62 B.C. (Plutarch, Cato minor 26). 5
opened in fraud and violence. It was prosecuted, in war and in peace,
through
illegality and treachery. He held a command in Af
lebeian aristocracy: its first consul (in 141 B.C.) had been promoted
through
patronage of the Scipiones. 4 Subsequent alliance
as in high spirits and fatal confidence. At variance with the Metelli
through
his clash with Nepos, he had broken with the Clau
umber of tribunes; further, less obtrusive and barely to be perceived
through
the tumultuous clamour of political life at Rome
heir turn received important military provinces, Syria and Macedonia,
through
special laws. Gabinius and Piso were the most c
95; S1G3 750). 3 Crassus was in alliance with the Metelli not only
through
his elder son (ILS 881). The younger, P. Crassus,
s and reinforced the party of Caesar. Caesar had risen to great power
through
Pompeius, helped by the lieutenants of Pompeius i
ambition of a Roman noble: but it was not his ambition to seize power
through
civil strife and hold it, supreme and alone. His
Caesar as ‘veterem et clementem dominum. ’ 3 Enhanced in importance
through
Cato’s martyr-death and posthumous fame, his stud
man than many have fancied; and no Roman conceived of government save
through
an oligarchy. But Caesar was being forced into an
restige, asserted that Pompeius was disloyal. Caesar had made enemies
through
Pompeius and now Pompeius had joined them. 1 A ju
survivors, nonentities, neutrals or renegades. A few names stand out,
through
merit or accident, from a dreary background. Neut
rcius Philippus, the prudent son of a father who had passed unscathed
through
the faction-wars of Marius and Sulla. 3 A consula
as that he never let down his friends. Where Pompeius lost supporters
through
inertia, vanity or perfidy, Caesar gained them an
On these men, C. Marcellus (cos. 50) and Philippus (cos. 56), related
through
marriage to Caesar’s grand-nephew, see below, p.
4 Sulla and Caesar, both members of patrician houses that had passed
through
a long period of obscurity, strove to revive and
h he received the franchise for service to Rome in the Sertorian War,
through
the agency of Pompeius. 2 Caesar, quaestor in His
es. In earlier days the Roman noble augmented his power and influence
through
attaching the aristocracy of Italy to his friends
nate by standing for quaestorship or tribunate or by direct adlection
through
the special powers of the Dictator. Hence a reinf
humble in origin. The centurionate was worth having: it could be got
through
patronage as well as service. 3 NotesPage=>0
he patricians of Rome, they asserted descent from kings and gods, and
through
all the frauds of pedigree and legend could at th
ivation of that municipal family from Faunus and the goddess Vitellia
through
an ancient and extinct patrician house of the ear
ate. Marius nursed resentment against the nobiles and sought to break
through
their monopoly of patronage. Through alliance wit
, but were autonomous allies. Italy had now become politically united
through
the extension of the Roman franchise, but the spi
Caesar’s invasion, the allies of Rome from Asculum in the Picene land
through
the Marsi and Paeligni down to Samnium and Lucani
traditional enemies of Italy. Caesar in his invasion pressed swiftly
through
Picenum towards Corfinium, gathering in the stron
Cicero made a speech, proposing an amnesty. In this simple fashion,
through
a coalition of Caesarians and Republicans, Rome r
adel. The facts and elements of power were larger than that. To carry
through
a Roman revolution in orderly form, in the first
confusion and inaccuracy: it has been brought into satisfactory order
through
the researches of O. E. Schmidt (Jahrbücher für c
reover, Antonius could induce him to depart to his province. Lepidus,
through
his family connexion with Brutus, might prove a b
s (cos. 50 B.C.); the son, in any event assured of a brilliant career
through
these influential connexions, was taken up by Cae
or the ambitious Octavianus, the gradual advancement of a Roman noble
through
the consecrated order of magistracies to the cons
ining. Legitimate primacy, it is true, could only be attained at Rome
through
many extra-constitutional resources, bribery, int
e memory of the Dictator, to their apprehensions or envy of Antonius:
through
them he might hope to influence neutral or Republ
id not return to Rome and the rival Caesarian leaders were reconciled
through
the insistence of the soldiery. To Antonius, no
othing was known. But late in October disquieting news came to Rome
through
private sources. It was reported that the legions
his ally Lepidus (who had brought Sex. Pompeius to terms) and carried
through
the allotment of praetorian provinces for the fol
cause for which better men had died, will none the less have striven
through
intrigue to maintain the newly retrieved eminence
us were nephews of the Dictator: they received a share of his fortune
through
the will, which they are said to have resigned to
ators emerge on his side. When four years have elapsed and Octavianus
through
all hazards, through all vicissitudes of craft an
ide. When four years have elapsed and Octavianus through all hazards,
through
all vicissitudes of craft and violence, extorts r
they are not an impressive company. 1 Senators who had come safely
through
civil war or who owed rank and fortune to one rev
young Pompeius, he was reluctant to break with Antonius, for he hoped
through
Antonius to get an early consulate for his own so
venturer required the open backing of senior statesmen in the Senate:
through
their auctoritas he might acquire recognition and
nd senseless luxury. 2 Being the father-in-law of Caesar, and elected
through
the agency of Pompeius and Caesar to the consulat
alty, despite harsh rebuffs and evidences of cold perfidy, for which,
through
easy self-deception, he chose to blame Caesar, th
ailure to comprehend his strategy. Then Caesar wooed him assiduously,
through
the familiar offices of Balbus and Oppius and by
ppus and of Marcellus were likewise of no weight. 4 Cicero’s path lay
through
Aquinum, but apparently he missed Hirtius and Bal
ation, or even on a short? Of the wisdom of raising up Caesar’s heir,
through
violence and illegal arms against Antonius, there
erits. Again, the law-courts were an avenue for political advancement
through
prosecution, a battle-ground for private enmities
no constitution at all. This meant that a revolution could be carried
through
without any violation of legal and constitutional
he constitution was held to be aristocratic. In fact, oligarchy ruled
through
consent and prescription. There were two principl
the Senate could at once legalize treason, condoning the private act
through
publica auctoritas; 3 the bribery of the troops o
rhaps be defended: he was at least a magistrate and held his province
through
legal provisions, namely the acta of Caesar the D
the principes’; such was the constant and bitter complaint of Cicero
through
the months when he clamoured for war. 4 ‘The cons
is own interests and an assiduous care for his own safety carried him
through
well-timed treacheries to a peaceful old age. Pla
esarian A. Allienus was conducting four legions northwards from Egypt
through
Palestine, to join Dolabella. They too went to sw
his advantage. Early in March came the news that Dolabella, passing
through
Asia on his way to Syria and opposed by the proco
iven to the enterprises of Brutus and Cassius. A thrill of horror ran
through
the Senate. The Republicans exploited their advan
certain that the troops would have obeyed. 1 And so Ventidius slipped
through
. Before long Octavianus received news from Rome
s and betrayed by his troops, fled northwards, hoping to make his way
through
the Alpine lands by a wide circuit to Macedonia.
was forging a new and more enduring compact of interest and sentiment
through
which the revived Caesarian party was to establis
ing the armies of the East, invading Italy and restoring the Republic
through
violence. He did not believe in violence. At Athe
s far out of reach. Before the end of May he began to march eastwards
through
Macedonia to regulate the affairs of Thrace, reco
the youth of Octavianus, exposed to an iron schooling and constrained
through
form of law and not in the heat of battle to shed
they settled accounts with the Liberators. Cicero could have escaped
through
indecision he lingered until too late. His murder
had many enemies among the nobiles, but certain of the more eminent,
through
family connexions and social influence, had been
stered his adherents and tenants, armed the slaves and fought his way
through
Italy to the sea coasts. 1 Arruntius did the sa
existing order and prevented a reconstitution of the old Roman People
through
a more equitable division of landed property in I
ite and fortify their front. Then Antonius arrived. Working his way
through
the marsh to the south around the flank of Cassiu
, NH 7, 148). PageBook=>205 Caesarians, led by Antonius, broke
through
the front of Cassius and pillaged his camp. Cassi
s of Brutus on the right wing, deceived perhaps, as one account runs,
through
a defect of his eyesight1 and believing that all
de earlier in the year. For a time he refused to let Salvidienus pass
through
the Cisalpina on NotesPage=>209 1 Appian,
his brother and his wife. Salvidienus made his way back from Spain
through
the Cisalpina; Pollio and Ventidius followed, slo
Ventidius, who, undecided and at variance, refused battle and retired
through
the Apennines. 6 Nor did help come from the south
oyed, the family and faction of the Pompeii had incurred heavy losses
through
desperate valour at Thapsus and Munda; and prince
clare himself too openly for his step-brother Octavianus: his father,
through
diplomacy, hoped to get him an early consulate. 6
attacked Octavianus as his ships, coming from Tarentum, were passing
through
the Straits of Messana to join his other fleet fr
mpronius Atratinus; 2 and Lepidus was conciliated or cajoled, perhaps
through
Antonius. Octavianus now had the ships. He need
Italian gentry and farmers. Many of the exiles had returned, and some
through
influence or protection got restitution of proper
their patron, whose cause suddenly revived when young Labienus broke
through
the Taurus with a Parthian army, encountering no
ill. Regard for Hellenic sentiments would reinforce peace and concord
through
alliance with the men of property and influence.
reached Ctesiphon, it might never return. Antonius proposed to march
through
a friendly Armenia, thence invading Media Atropat
a feud with subsequent repercussions. 1 Ahenobarbus was steadfast all
through
against the blandishments of Cleopatra, refusing
emy. Yet, on the other hand, the united front was not achieved merely
through
intimidation. Of the manner in which the measure
nd the activities of Drusus precipitated war. But Italy, become Roman
through
grant of the franchise after the Bellum Italicum,
ck into harbour. 1 Antonius himself with forty ships managed to break
through
and follow Cleopatra in flight to Egypt. Treacher
y. Canidius the commander sought to induce his soldiers to march away
through
Macedonia, but in vain. He had to escape to Anton
=>299 order the execution of a woman. After negotiations managed
through
his friends Gallus and Proculeius, he interviewed
ated Egypt as his own private and dynastic possession and governed it
through
a viceroy, jealously excluding Roman senators. Th
ople. By what right had it been in his hand? He indicates that it was
through
general consent that he had acquired supreme powe
IN his sixth and seventh consulates C. Julius Caesar Octavianus went
through
a painless and superficial transformation. The pr
means to initiate and direct public policy at Rome if not to control
through
consular imperium the proconsuls abroad. 2 For su
so close as to be damaging. Pompeius Magnus governed Spain in absence
through
his legates. At the same time he acquired a quasi
t, from the day when the youth of twenty-three raised a private army,
through
special commands abroad and political compacts at
conceived the idea of the rule of the ‘optimus civis’ from Panaetius
through
Cicero. PageBook=>322 would pretend that i
gustus was none the less a revolutionary leader who won supreme power
through
civil war. All that he needed from Cicero he had
nstitution was subservient. This time the new enactments were carried
through
under the auspices of the supreme magistrates, Au
fferent territories comprised in his provincia and to administer them
through
his legates, according to the needs of the region
suls. Thus Pompeius Magnus had governed Spain as proconsul in absence
through
three legates, namely one consular and two praeto
ther Britain or Parthia had no place in the mind of Augustus. Passing
through
the south of Gaul he arrived in Spain before the
rom recorded history. When M. Agrippa went out, he administered Syria
through
deputies, residing himself in the island of Lesbo
ve but ever present in counsel and ready for action. Agrippa had been
through
all the wars of the Revolution and had won most o
bove all, military service. In this way a soldier’s family might rise
through
equestrian to senatorial rank in two or three gen
is general and personally attached to the head of the government and,
through
him, to the Roman State. One body of troops stood
cruited in two ways. First, soldiers or soldiers’ sons become knights
through
military service. T. Flavius Petro, from Reate, a
no commercial upstart, no military careerist rising in social status
through
service as a centurion. But P. Ovidius Naso was n
usted democracy, were able to thwart the exercise of popular sovranty
through
a republican constitution which permitted any fre
ified: it was rejuvenated in two ways, by knights’ sons made eligible
through
grant of the lattis clavus and by youthful quaest
ave up: converted since Actium into an office of ostensible authority
through
Augustus’ continuous tenure, and regaining its an
eleven nobiles. 1 Conspicuous among the latter are men whose fathers
through
death or defeat in the Civil Wars had missed the
nds already existed. 4 It was some time before their number increased
through
division of provinces, through new conquests and
ome time before their number increased through division of provinces,
through
new conquests and by the creation of Moesia to th
haps evade detection. Certain great houses had sunk for ever. Others,
through
casualties in the Civil Wars, loss of money and i
he moderate Caesarian P. Servilius, the youth proceeded in four years
through
a constrained and unconsummated union with a step
tch with Livia, the Princeps long ago had won the Claudian connexion:
through
the marriages of others he subsequently ensnared
and the Fabii. As the young generation of nobiles grew up and passed
through
the avenue of political honours to the consulate,
eighty men. 1 Upon his own adherents the Princeps bestowed nobility
through
the consulate, social distinction by advantageous
n their working. Political competition was sterilized and regulated
through
a pervasive system of patronage and nepotism. Hen
relaxed his control of the armies, holding the most powerful of them
through
his own legates. Three military provinces, howeve
ispensation Augustus held the territories and armies of his provincia
through
his legati pro praetore who, for reasons various
4). PageBook=>399 P. Sulpicius Quirinius (cos. 12 B.C.) passed
through
a long career of faithful service to Augustus and
tuated their old political alliance with the Caesarian cause, but not
through
the Triumvir. His nephew and enemy, Paullus Aemil
wo of them were artfully interlocked with the descendants of Augustus
through
his daughter Julia, Germanicus being betrothed to
Arruntius himself (cos. A.D. 6) may have Pompeian blood or connexions
through
the Cornelii Sullae, cf. Tacitus, Ann. 3, 31; E.
and Antonius, it was not from tenderness for Tiberius. It may be that
through
the ruin of his daughter he sought finally to mak
llies; and in A.D.I, when his son and heir was consul, he came safely
through
the climacteric year of a man’s life, the sixty-t
was dispatched to a suitable island (A.D. 7). Augustus still lived
through
the scandals of his family. The disasters of his
y. L. Arruntius came of a wealthy and talented family, newly ennobled
through
his father, admiral at Actium, consul in 22 B.C.,
Lentuli, men of more recent stocks such as L. Nonius Asprenas (linked
through
marriage with L. Calpurnius Piso, with Varus and
ary execution of Agrippa Postumus. It was ordered and done in secret,
through
Sallustius Crispus, a secretary of state, in virt
grotesque intensity. Rome had won universal empire half-reluctant,
through
a series of accidents, the ever-widening claims o
. Material encouragement was required. Many old families had died out
through
lack of heirs, the existence of others was precar
office by flagrant bribery and popularity with the Roman mob, Lepidus
through
favour of Antonius, by a procedure condemned as i
ii. Opulent families spent their substance in ostentation or perished
through
ambition and intrigue. Novi homines from the town
3 Laws were not enough. The revolutionary leader had won power more
through
propaganda than through force of arms: some of hi
. The revolutionary leader had won power more through propaganda than
through
force of arms: some of his greatest triumphs had
k=>459 IN Rome of the Republic the aristocracy guided literature
through
individual patronage. As in politics, the other c
sar had not wavered or turned back. Announced by Apollo, his path lay
through
blood and war, bella, horrida bella, et Thybr
clientela of Caesar Augustus and the dynasty in the first place, and
through
the dynasty to Rome and the Empire. 1 The institu
cedure for dealing with cases of extortion. Moreover, the provincials
through
their concilia possessed an organ for voicing com
oisoning, attacked by Cassius Severus, defended by Pollio and rescued
through
the personal intervention of Augustus, who came t
ped as the open enemy of freedom and truth. But not for long. Coerced
through
official repression, or tainted by servility, his
ed with these four families, the Catonian faction suffered heavy loss
through
loyal or stubborn adhesion to lost causes Pompeiu
or the Calpurnii Bibuli. The Domitii, however, survived and prospered
through
the marriage alliance which the grandson of Caesa
history of the Republic. Tiberius, doubly Claudian, for the line ran
through
both parents, could look back through the annals
ubly Claudian, for the line ran through both parents, could look back
through
the annals of the family to that Appius Claudius
primacy among his peers but not at the cost of personal humiliation,
through
disaster and bloodshed as an aged despot’s disapp
cs from early youth. Like Brutus originally an enemy of Pompeius, and
through
that feud brought into conflict with Caesar, he f
erwards. 3 The Fabii and the Valerii regained distinction and power
through
the patronage of Caesar and of Augustus. Of the F
lpurnius Piso (cos. 15 B.C.). Pompeius the Great had descendants only
through
collaterals or through the female line, such as C
B.C.). Pompeius the Great had descendants only through collaterals or
through
the female line, such as Cn. Cornelius Cinna, and
of M. Plautius Silvanus from Tibur had become connected in some way,
through
marriage or adoption, with a new consular stock o
us had a share in the making of it, from the dynasts’ pact in 60 B.C.
through
civil wars and Dictatorship into the rule of the
Roman knights. He might have to sink further yet, to make his peace,
through
subservience or through adulation, with the real
have to sink further yet, to make his peace, through subservience or
through
adulation, with the real forces in politics knigh
, courtiers male and female. Quies preserved the house of the Cocceii
through
many generations; 3 but it could not ultimately p
method for an ambitious man to secure distinction and advancement was
through
the conduct of a successful prosecution. Under th
ent. It was also primeval, fated to return again when a state had run
through
the whole cycle of change. The Roman, with his
e last age of the Republic. Few were the nobiles who passed unscathed
through
these trials, from caution like L. Marcius Philip
Wealth, of senators and knights in the Republic, 12, 14; transference
through
the proscriptions, 194 ff., 243, 290, 351; owned
ucidation of the connexion with the descendants of Pompeius and Sulla
through
the marriage between Faustus Sulla and Pompeia th
e, pp. 424 and 496 f. For the Calpurnii and the posterity of Pompeius
through
the line of the Scribonii, cf. the stemmata of Gr