before in favour of other dynasts; and Caesar asserted both legal and
moral
rights to preferential treatment. In the last res
for him, rancorous and incorruptible. A jury carefully selected, with
moral
support from soldiers of Pompeius stationed aroun
of the Dictator, took the opportunity to sketch a modest programme of
moral
and social reform. 2 Having written treatises abo
psa iam diffluxerunt severis legibus vincienda sunt. ’ Caesar carried
moral
and sumptuary legislation (Suetonius, Divus Iuliu
words, Virgil, Horace and Livy tell the same tale and point the same
moral
. 1 Yet speculation cannot be debarred from play
st and his association with the Queen of Egypt were vulnerable to the
moral
and patriotic propaganda of his rival. Most of th
a specious unity to the action or permits apology or condemnation on
moral
and emotional grounds. All conventions are baffle
him to treat Caesar’s heir with loyalty and respect. Yielding to this
moral
suasion, Antonius agreed to a formal and public r
virtus (without always being able to prevail against posterity or the
moral
standards of another age), Brutus was not only a
c are embodied in types as perfect of their kind as are the civic and
moral
paragons of early days; which is fitting, for the
survivors of the proscriptions, of Philippi, of Perusia. With this
moral
support Antonius confronted his Caesarian rival.
t a distance from Rome. Contemporaries were pained and afflicted by
moral
and by social degradation. True merit was not the
s of a war between classes. Through experience of affairs, candour of
moral
pessimism and utter lack of political illusions t
isms were borrowed, men said, lifted from Cato; not less so the grave
moral
tone, flagrant in contrast with his earlier life.
anus evaded the charge of breach of contract. Preferring a topic with
moral
and emotional appeal, he turned the weight of his
l of Rome and Italy. But violence was not enough: he still lacked the
moral
justification for war, and the moral support of t
not enough: he still lacked the moral justification for war, and the
moral
support of the Roman People. The charges and coun
ion, produce votes of the local senates and facilitate by money or by
moral
suasion the levying of ‘volunteer’ armies in a pa
legions to a general of Caesar’s dash and vigour; but they lacked the
moral
advantage of attack and that stimulating dose of
l dominions and a firm authority to enforce a programme of social and
moral
regeneration. The constitutional settlement of
ounced a return to Republican practices and a beginning of social and
moral
reform. 4 That process was to be celebrated as th
d, despite the inferences plausibly to be derived from the social and
moral
programme which he was held to have inspired. He
elements’, some two hundred were induced to retire by the exercise of
moral
suasion. 2 The true character of the purge, so
C.: he delayed until 18 B.C., the year of the introduction of the new
moral
code, when, in face of opposition and by complica
ght a national war against a political woman, the Queen of Egypt. The
moral
programme of the New State was designed to keep w
rinceps her father had promulgated the laws that were to sanction the
moral
regeneration of Rome. 7 It may be tempting, but i
’ PageBook=>427 Augustus was bitter and merciless because his
moral
legislation had been baffled and mocked in his ow
liticians could hardly afford in this critical season the luxury of a
moral
purge of high society. What induced him to court
cal lady. Her paramours the five nobiles are not innocent triflers or
moral
reprobates but a formidable faction. Gracchus bea
and frugality. 4 How could they be restored? About the efficacy of
moral
and sumptuary legislation there might well be dou
quo facilius possint maiora discere’ (Cicero, De república 1, 30). No
moral
or political value ‘nec meliores ob earn scientia
of firm, dignified and decent worship of the Roman gods. That was the
moral
source of Rome’s power: nam quantum ferro tantu
to the authentic and revolutionary Gracchi were at one in awarding to
moral
and military excellence the primacy over pecuniar
ious, and the unspeakable Vedius Pollio; and in his own household the
moral
legislation of the Princeps was most signally baf
granddaughter though in truth their offence was political rather than
moral
. Nor is it certain that the Princeps himself was
whole conception of the Roman past upon which he sought to erect the
moral
and spiritual basis of the New State was in a lar
imonious, successful in business life, self-righteous and intolerably
moral
. The Italian bourgeoisie had their sweet revenge
as a party leader and sufficient confidence to persist in the task of
moral
and social regeneration. The political structure
Despite the varied checks and disappointments in Augustus’ policy of
moral
and patriotic regeneration, the effort had not be
ue, attacking both oligarchy and the power of money, with advocacy of
moral
and social reform. 2 The Dictator further encoura
er abest rei. 2 Without need of apology and more naturally came the
moral
, rustic and patriotic vein to the poet Virgil. Th
ompositions fostered by the government, Livy’s history was patriotic,
moral
and hortatory. Even antiquarianism had its uses.
ke. Like the early Germans depicted by Tacitus, he did not think that
moral
laxity was a topic of innocent amusement. 4 Nor
ech, as no order else in the New State. They demonstrated against the
moral
code and later clamoured loudly that Julia should
cluded. Already in the Triumviral period Pollio was quick to draw the
moral
of the times, intelligent to anticipate the futur
ew what Patavium was a city notorious for material prosperity and for
moral
worth. 4 PageNotes. 485 1 Tacitus, Dial. 21,
ble. The word ‘Patavinitas’ sums up, elegantly and finally, the whole
moral
and romantic view of history. 1 Pollio knew what
erted into recognition and love: exstinctus amabitur idem. 2 This
moral
platitude became a wild paradox under the Empire.
uetonius, Divus Aug. 85, 1. PageBook=>507 The argument and the
moral
may readily be inferred Cato, always an advocate
4 The Republican profession was not so much political as social and
moral
: it was more often a harmless act of homage to th
new settlement, 333 ff.; acts in 22 B.C., 339; in the East, 371, 388;
moral
programme, 443 ff.; in Gaul and Spain, 388 f.; af
314, 330, 336, 394 f., 406; administrative reforms, 401 ff., 410 f.;
moral
reforms, 443 ff. His real power, 2 f., 322 f., 37
, 155; on Augustus, 3; on the Restoration of the Republic, 324 f.; on
moral
legislation, 455; on virtue and vice, 105; on Rep
asant soldiers, 449, 451; on freedmen, 354; the interpretation of his
moral
and patriotic poetry, 451 f., 461 f.; his Ode to
, 456 ff.; total after Actium, 304; in 13 B.C., 389 f. Legislation,
moral
, 53, 443 ff.; efficacy of, 442, 455 f. Leges Ju
2; prerogatives of, 322; loss of prerogatives, 404 f.; need for their
moral
reform, 442; rivals of Tiberius, 433 f.; in compa
Reate, 90, 354. ‘Rechtsfrage’, slight importance of, 48. Reform,
moral
, the need for, 52 f., 335; carried out by Augustu