operty by a revolutionary leader. The happy outcome of the Principate
might
be held to justify, or at least to palliate, the
o objects and claims him for a Stoic. PageBook=>003 of the law
might
circumscribe the prerogative of the First Citizen
breach between Pompeius and Caesar and the outbreak of war in 49 B.C.
might
appear to open the final act in the fall of the R
ancestors aspired to the highest magistracy of the Roman Republic2 he
might
rise to the praetorship but no higher, save by a
blement) was a rare phenomenon at Rome. 3 Before the sovran people he
might
boast how he had led them to victory in a mighty
nal allegiance contracted in every walk of life, the political dynast
might
win influence not merely in Rome but in the count
ng the plebs and by due subservience towards the financial interests,
might
have perpetuated in Rome and Italy its harsh and
as an advocate, though not brilliant cautious and crafty in habit, he
might
seem destined by wealth, family, and paramount in
nship and reciprocal interest. They called themselves Optimates: they
might
properly be described, in contemporary definition
rinciple to give inner coherence and courage to make the reforms that
might
save and justify the rule of class and privilege.
heirs of the dominant and interlocking groups of the governing party
might
assert the claims of birth and talent. There were
ath, the predominance of the Metelli seemed to be passing. Leadership
might
therefore fall to that part of the oligarchy whic
in financial subsidy to his allies and tireless in the law-courts, he
might
yet prevail against the popularity and laurels of
mpeius was Princeps beyond dispute but not at Rome. By armed force he
might
have established sole rule, but by that alone and
pursuit of ambition to adopt the language and tactics of a demagogue,
might
be captured by the government at a certain stage
loud threats that he would deprive Caesar of army and provinces. Some
might
hope to persuade Pompeius, making him sacrifice C
s which he may have done much to provoke. 4 Had he dropped Caesar, he
might
have been entrapped by the Optimates and circumve
o establish a military autocracy. Their ambitions and their rivalries
might
have been tolerated in a small city-state or in a
hians (53 B.C.), the danger of a breach between Pompeius and his ally
might
appear imminent. It was not so in reality. Pompei
th were retained in Italy. Though Pompeius or the enemies of Caesar
might
prevail at the consular elections, that was no un
r patron, were ready to bring their levies at his command. Magnus, it
might
seem, was strong enough to prevent civil war, fre
sing. Death took off their consuls one by one. 2 Marriage or adoption
might
retrieve the waning fortunes of a noble family.
t was often conceit or stupidity and mistook craft for sagacity. They
might
have known better Cato’s stubborn refusal to agre
d Pompeius listened and consented to an interview, their old amicitia
might
have been repaired. With the nominal primacy of P
stige of Pompeius. They would be able to deal with Pompeius later. It
might
not come to open war; and Pompeius was still in t
orbade intervention in a struggle which was not their own. 2 Pompeius
might
stamp with his foot in the land of Italy, as he h
al powers: after a civil war the need was patent. The Dictator’s task
might
well demand several years. In 46 B.C. his powers
he eastern frontier of the Empire. At Rome he was hampered: abroad he
might
enjoy his conscious mastery of men and events, as
te by the interested device of the leaders of the Caesarian party. It
might
appear that subsequent accounts have been guilty
future or laid the foundation of a consistent government. Whatever it
might
be, it would owe more to the needs of the moment
y pause from political activity: with the lapse of time the situation
might
become clearer in one way or another. NotesPage
becomes irrelevant. Caesar was slain for what he was, not for what he
might
become. 6 The assumption of a Dictatorship for li
bsence, the passage of time and the solid benefits of peace and order
might
abate men’s resentment against Caesar, insensibly
rsuits of Marcus Brutus, the representative figure in the conspiracy,
might
lend plausible colouring to such a theory. Yet it
nsactions (SIG3 748, 36): Brutus, invoking the sanctity of contracts,
might
have urged that, after all, they had ‘hired the m
essed. 1 Nor was his political conduct wholly to be predicted. Brutus
might
well have been a Caesarian neither he nor Caesar
rutus 4, cf. Pompeius 64). PageBook=>059 Brutus and his allies
might
invoke philosophy or an ancestor who had liberate
Neutrality was repugnant to a noble and a man of spirit: but kinship
might
be invoked in excuse. Hence one of the Marcelli,
nsulars who supported Pompeius and of Cato’s partisans. 2 Civil war
might
cut across families: as this was a contest neithe
n of Philippus joined the Caesarian tribunes. 4 Old associations that
might
have appeared negligible or tenuous were faithful
al patronage as well as for military experience. His numerous legates
might
have been the nucleus of a formidable faction. 3
atter class does not show a conspicuously high proportion. 5 Whatever
might
be their origin or affiliation, the generals of t
hope for the consulate. 7 Other Pompeians and other men from Picenum
might
be captured by the arts, the gold NotesPage=>
f Rome. 2 Patrician and plebeian understood each other. The patrician
might
recall past favours conferred upon the Roman pleb
efended the man of Gades. Cicero also spoke. Envious detractors there
might
be but Balbus, the friend of such eminent citizen
Alps. Excellent men from the colonies and municipia of the Cisalpina
might
be found among the officers and friends of Pompei
er the menace of expulsion by implacable censors; the scribe likewise
might
well be in possession of the census of a Roman kn
olonies and municipia of this region, virile, prosperous and reputed,
might
with truth be extolled as the flower of Italy, th
sway the policy of his city or influence a whole region of Italy3 he
might
be able, like the Roman noble, to levy a private
d men could remember whole wars waged by a single clan. Such families
might
modify their name to a Latin flexion; but praenom
wer at Rome, the patricians were ready to enlist allies wherever they
might
be found. They spread their influence among the l
is Etruscan, disguised by a Latin termination. 3 The plebeian houses
might
acquire wealth and dynastic power at Rome, but th
Arpinum, was helped by the Metelli. For merit and military service he
might
enter the senatorial order under their protection
um Italicum, gain from Caesar the dignity they deserved but otherwise
might
never have attained. Herius Asinius, the first ma
.C.), on whom below, p. 199. PageBook=>094 obscure men. 1 That
might
be expected: it is the earliest consuls that conv
. But the triumph of a military leader, reviving the party of Marius,
might
promise change. 2 Cicero claimed that in the spac
r the funeral (see the preceding note), it would not prove, though it
might
support, the view that Antonius intended to cause
esarian, respect for liberty, for tradition, and for the constitution
might
appear to survive in Italy. Not everywhere, or am
escence of the irregular cult of Caesar at Rome: it was hoped that he
might
be induced to support the Liberators. 1 Further,
ength, when the popular excitement had subsided: time and forbearance
might
triumph over violence, heroism or principle. The
m politics and political strife so firmly imposed by the Dictatorship
might
even be prolonged. It all turned upon the Caesari
onius desired them to be away from Rome: a temporary absence at least
might
have been admitted by the friends of Brutus, to s
s outside Rome, provoking a native rising in Gaul or else the legions
might
invade Italy to avenge the Imperator. Unable to r
he Dictator’s war-chest, intended for the Balkan and eastern wars, it
might
be doubted whether much was still at Rome for Ant
dily. To what end? Primacy in the Caesarian party was now his: but he
might
have to fight to retain it. More than that, Ant
in his consulate. For the sake of peace, the predominance of Antonius
might
have to be admitted by neutrals even by Republica
t to his province. Lepidus, through his family connexion with Brutus,
might
prove a bond of alliance between the Caesarians a
ng with the principes a source of intrigue and feuds. Pompeius they
might
have tolerated for a time, or even Caesar, but no
to be stripped of its legions. As for the East, Trebonius and Cimber
might
have Asia and Bithynia: the only armies east of M
was the Lex de permutatione provinciarum (June 1st). 4 This manoeuvre
might
well alarm the moderates NotesPage=>115 1
crudescence of public disorder and the emergence of a Caesarian rival
might
well force Antonius back again to the policy whic
informants from Rome reported at Rhegium an expectation that Antonius
might
surrender his provincial command, that Brutus and
. 113; 10, 8. PageBook=>120 July has already been narrated. He
might
invoke the tribunate, emulating the Gracchi and a
Dictator, to their apprehensions or envy of Antonius: through them he
might
hope to influence neutral or Republican elements.
f it did, it would have been very different and very short. Lessons
might
indeed be learned, but from men and affairs, from
but not hopeless on the other side, certain moderates and Republicans
might
be lured and captured by the genial idea of emplo
d until the expiration of his consular year, he was lost. His enemies
might
win the provincial armies. Brutus and Cassius had
ypt were riotous, that Cassius was expected there. 3 Further, Cassius
might
appeal to the large armies in Syria. It was proba
mised. They would have to go quietly for the present but their chance
might
come. Octavianus’ other relatives were of little
y the beginning of October the young man possessed a huge war-fund it
might
provide Antonius with an incentive to attack and
er the last name, If Nicolaus is correct and correctly transmitted we
might
have here not Maecenas but his father (so Münzer,
attempts at identification have been made, none satisfactory. Λ∈ύκιος
might
be Balbus but Balbus’ activities were usually les
story: he derided them as torpid and bibulous. 2 Hirtius and Pansa
might
yet save the Republic, not, as some hoped, by act
nonentity is a power when consul at Rome. A policy they had, and they
might
achieve it to restore concord in the Caesarian pa
acking of senior statesmen in the Senate: through their auctoritas he
might
acquire recognition and official standing. Which
inst Antonius, namely L. Piso, P. Servilius and Cicero, and therefore
might
be said to have encouraged the designs of Octavia
ch of neglecting the public good for the pursuit of selfish pleasure,
might
still be NotesPage=>135 1 Cicero, In Pison
en the parties. Being related to Brutus, to Cassius and to Lepidus he
might
become the link in a new political alignment betw
o surrendered to the obsession. Otherwise there were many things that
might
have brought Cicero and Caesar together a common
absent Pompeians, who would deal with neutrals as with enemies. Spain
might
bring them victory after all. The agonies of a lo
Senate, the theatre of his old triumphs. With the passing of time, he
might
indeed have silenced his conscience and acquiesce
of the Senate on August 1st and some prospect that Brutus and Cassius
might
return to political life. 1 Cicero turned back.
to meet. By venturing to attack the policy of Antonius, Cicero, it
might
be argued, came out into the open at last, and ma
erhaps have had cognizance at Leucopetra. Only a domestic quarrel, it
might
appear, in the ranks of the Caesarian party: yet
ake the waters. 5 Wherever there was trouble, the secret agent Balbus
might
be detected in the background. For Cicero, in fea
a were enthusiastic. Among the plebs he had a great following; and he
might
win more respectable backing. ‘But look at his ag
eserted his post after March 17th when concord and ordered government
might
still have been achieved. Now, at last, a chanc
firm as Cato had stood, he would be the leader of the Optimates. It
might
fairly be claimed that Cicero made ample atonemen
at the outset, had not always been sustained with constancy. 1 Cicero
might
rail at the consulars: but the advocates of conco
chable Balbus. Would that all good men and champions of Rome’s empire
might
become her citizens! Where a man came from did no
ceive the hardened adept at the game of Roman politics, none the less
might
influence the innocent or the neutral. Merely to
that was too simple, too crude. It had all been heard before: but it
might
be hard to resist the deceitful assertions of a p
tical literature of the period had been more abundantly preserved, it
might
be discovered that respect for law, tradition and
to be ‘enemies of peace’. 1 In detestation of civil war, Republicans
might
honestly hold an unjust peace to be better than t
be spurned because they were dangerous as well as dishonourable5 they
might
impair the resolution of the patriotic front. 6 T
man and a Senator. 7 In open war the language of peace and goodwill
might
still suitably be employed to seduce the allies o
most binding ties of personal allegiance. For profit or for safety it
might
be necessary to change sides. Suitable terminolog
. The legionaries at least were sincere. From personal loyalty they
might
follow great leaders like Caesar or Antonius: the
on whichever side they stood. 2 The conversion of a military leader
might
sometimes have to be enforced, or at least accele
dinary commands were against the spirit of the constitution8 but they
might
be necessary to save the State. Of that the Senat
atus fuit. ’ PageBook=>161 not everything. A leader or a party
might
find that the constitution was being perversely i
rprise of citizens, banded together for the good of the Commonwealth,
might
then organize opinion in Italy so as to exert uno
oldiery recompense in land and money. The claim urged for D. Brutus
might
perhaps be defended: he was at least a magistrate
nsul Antonius. That prospect was cheerfully envisaged. What resources
might
be enlisted for the struggle? The authority of
which fixed two years as the tenure of a consular province: but that
might
have been contested, for Antonius’ command was no
g could be done, and Antonius, his rights and his prestige respected,
might
show himself amenable to an accommodation. Seven
ption of irrevocable measures. Under the threat of war a compromise
might
save appearances: which did not meet the ideas of
he terms that the adversary would offer, he conjectured that Antonius
might
yield the Cisalpina but cling to Gallia Comata. 2
up the Flaminia to Ariminum but not to fight if he could avoid it. He
might
yet baffle both Cicero and Antonius. But he could
mies of the Republic in northern Italy would have an easy task. So it
might
seem. Antonius broke away, moving along the Aemil
e the person of Octavianus. Hirtius and Pansa, at the head of armies,
might
have been able to arrest hostilities after the de
olved to stand firm, precarious though his own position was. Antonius
might
be destroyed hence ruin to the Caesarian cause, a
egain the support of Lepidus and Plancus. Antonius and the Liberators
might
even combine against their common enemy civil war
nger vicissitudes of alliance. 3 Yet, even if this did not happen, he
might
be caught between Caesarians in the West and Repu
Book=>167 their estates; and the soldiers serving in the legions
might
expect ultimate recompense from their generals wi
to be discarded. 3 Cicero and Octavianus were to be joint consuls. It
might
fairly be represented that the mature wisdom of a
tions of a slave to a despot. ’1 Cicero had suggested that Octavianus
might
be induced to pardon the assassins of Caesar. ‘Be
apital. As in Sulla’s proscription, nobiles and political adversaries
might
head the list: the bulk is made up by the names o
n legions. But Salvidienus was not unique: foreigners or freed slaves
might
compete with knights for military command in the
w became the recompense of craft or crime. ‘Non mos, non ius. ’3 So
might
the period be described. But the Caesarians claim
gmatic alien called Machaeras (Josephus, BJ 1, 317, &c). The name
might
really be ‘Machares’, which occurs in the royal h
ous struggle was a potent argument for concord. Brutus and Antonius
might
have understood each other and compromised for pe
ave risen to his thoughts. Brutus had divined it Antonius, he said,
might
have been numbered with Cato, with Brutus and wit
e hands of Pompeius. As for Africa, should Lepidus make complaint, he
might
have that for his share. These engagements were d
dealing with L. Antonius, that was the least of his difficulties. He
might
easily be overwhelmed by the Antonian generals, s
ν ξίωσιν καθαιρ . PageBook=>210 his way to Spain; 1 and now he
might
bar the return of Octavianus’ best marshal and la
il war with a fair prospect of destroying the rival Caesarian leader,
might
well seem to cry out for an explanation. It was e
s to rally and march against Antonius; some turned back. 4 Octavianus
might
command a mass of legions: they were famished and
ar which bore as its title the consulate of Pollio and Calvinus. 4 It
might
not have happened: the armed confrontation of the
tions of astrologers and the speculations of Pythagorean philosophers
might
conspire with some plausibility and discover in t
Philippi and Perusia it had seemed for a time that the young Pompeius
might
be a champion of the Republican cause. But it was
eed slaves manned his ships and filled his motley legions. Pompeius
might
sweep the seas, glorying in the favour and name o
e seas, glorying in the favour and name of Neptune; 4 the Roman plebs
might
riot in his honour it was only from hatred of Cae
ovincial clientela like that of Pompeius or the Caesarian leaders, he
might
still exert the traditional policy of family alli
ghter of Antonius. Again, Republicans in the company of Sex. Pompeius
might
be able to influence Antonius or Lepidus: they ha
p of Agrippa and the diplomacy of Maecenas. Lacking either of them he
might
have been lost. Antonius was induced to come to T
imself ‘Imperator Caesar’. 8 The Senate and People for these bodies
might
suitably be convoked for ceremonial purposes or g
tavianus was already exploring the propaganda and the sentiments that
might
serve him later against Antonius, winning for per
ly insurance not uncommon in the civil wars, when piety or protection
might
triumph over political principle, saving lives an
this end he devoted his energies in the years 35 and 34 B.C. Antonius
might
fight the wars of the Republic or of private ambi
to safeguard Italy. The victories of Antonius paled with distance or
might
be artfully depreciated; his own achievements wou
shed claims to the consulate by brutality or by craft. 2 The marshals
might
disappear, some as suddenly as they had arisen, b
es and as diplomats. 4 In a free state the study of law and oratory
might
confer the highest rewards. The practice of publi
ts of the plain style, which could claim to be traditional and Roman,
might
be prized and preserved until threatened by a com
tion of private virtue; and some brand or other of Pythagorean belief
might
suitably commend itself to mystical inclinations.
t public signs of their existence, were susceptible to such an appeal
might
well be doubted. The aged Varro, the most learned
s and Caesar, but of a wider and even more menacing perspective. They
might
reflect upon the death of Alexander the Macedonia
ke, that history repeated itself in cyclical revolutions. For Rome it
might
appear to be the time of Sulla come again; in a l
occupation for members of the governing class: the retired politician
might
with propriety occupy his leisure in recording mo
e. On the writing of poetry, however, the Roman aristocrat, though he
might
turn a verse with ease, or fill a volume, set no
the poet was reluctant, the patron too wise to insist. Yet something
might
be done. It was folly not to exploit the treasure
o manhood in an age of war and knew the age for what it was. Others
might
succumb to black despair: Horace instead derived
ent: the retainers of an owner of land, once enlisted in his defence,
might
escape from control, terrorize their neighbourhoo
d been arrested in time. After the next subversion of public order it
might
go farther, embracing not only impoverished citiz
he first beginnings of a patriotic revival, the new taste for history
might
be induced to revert to the remotest origins of t
of blood or title, the personal following of Rome’s ruler in the East
might
suitably be extended to embrace the whole aristoc
uence. 1 A day would come when the ruling class in the cities of Asia
might
hope to enter the Senate of Rome, take rank with
Antonius 28. | PageBook=>264 Roman army reached Ctesiphon, it
might
never return. Antonius proposed to march through
Crete; 2 and his grant of the Roman franchise to the whole of Sicily
might
appear to portend the coming abolition of another
eakness, fomented danger and embarrassment to Rome. A revived Egypt
might
likewise play its part in the Roman economy of em
es were weak, its monarchs impotent or ridiculous. Pompeius or Caesar
might
have annexed: they wisely preferred to preserve t
ellenistic dynast was ambiguous, disquieting and vulnerable. Credence
might
be given to the most alarming accounts of his ult
) as they were to Octavianus’ agents and to subsequent historians. It
might
be represented that Antonius was making provision
k=>274 When he dwelt at Athens with Octavia, Antonius’ behaviour
might
be construed as deference to Hellenistic suscepti
political consequences. By 33 B.C., however, the ambition of Antonius
might
have moved farther in this direction. He had not
us and C. Sosius, his trusted adherents. The contents of this missive
might
be guessed: it was to be imparted to the Senate o
cti was to be Cn. Pompeius, a great-grandson of Sulla. Historic names
might
convey the guarantee, or at least advertise the s
. Valerius, L. Cornelius and Cn. Pompeius on the Fasti. These consuls
might
have been designated for office at an earlier dat
s were on his side. Antonius stood on the defensive and therefore, it
might
be represented, for peace. For war his prestige a
sed along the coasts. He was confident and ready for the struggle but
might
not open it yet. Here the two consuls met him in
ntonius passed from Ephesus to Samos and from Samos to Athens. Now it
might
seem that Cleopatra had finally triumphed. Antoni
h politics. Now came an opportune discovery so opportune that forgery
might
be suspected, though the provisions of the will d
e bidding of enemies of Caesar or of Antonius? The Roman constitution
might
be endangered: that was a name and a deception. E
upport from the colony of Cales in Campania. 2 Less eminent partisans
might
be no less effective. The Paelignian town of Sulm
agency of a local office-holding family, the Ovidii. 3 The soldiery
might
be purchased, the lower orders deceived or dragoo
l sentiments of the upper and middle classes at this time? Many a man
might
discern a patent fraud, distrust the propaganda o
and by language between the Latin West and the Greek East. The Empire
might
split into two parts very easily. It is one of th
ere not deceived by the artifices of Octavianus or their own emotions
might
be impelled by certain melancholy reflections to
cts and wars of the last thirty years, though liberty perished, peace
might
be achieved. It was worth it not merely to the mi
his preparations of army and fleet, but not perhaps as resolute as he
might
appear. Antonius now had to stand beside Cleopatr
doned the Albanian coast and the western end of the Via Egnatia. That
might
appear an error: it was probably a ruse. Antonius
troying the Caesarians. Time, money and supplies were on his side: he
might
delay and fight a battle with little loss of Roma
ministered to the army of the West. Yet, in the last resort, Antonius
might
not need to appeal to the legions to stand in bat
to appeal to the legions to stand in battle against their kinsmen. He
might
be able to employ sea-power with a mastery that n
there was), and avoidance of bloodshed to Rome, is not known. Sosius
might
be suspected. Certain of the Antonians were execu
X, 113 ff. PageBook=>301 children of Cleopatra, whatever they
might
be and whatever they were worth, Octavianus natur
al honour clamoured for a war of revenge; and the last of the dynasts
might
desire to outshine all the generals of the Republ
evant to the history of those years. Octavianus had his own ideas. It
might
be inexpedient to defy, but it was easy to delude
g in war nor aggressive in policy. Adulation, perversity or ignorance
might
elevate Parthia to be a rival empire of Rome :2 i
the frontier provinces. The exaltation of peace by a Roman statesman
might
attest a victory, but it portended no slackening
life and soul averted. But salvation hung upon a single thread. Well
might
men adjure the gods of Rome to preserve that prec
s in 29 B.C.4 But insistence on military monarchy and Trojan ancestry
might
provoke disquiet. When the Triumvir Antonius abod
uiet. When the Triumvir Antonius abode for long years in the East men
might
fear lest the city be dethroned from its pride of
and its leader to rule? He had resigned the title of Triumvir, but it
might
have been contended that he continued unobtrusive
lerable compromise with Senate and People, certain eminent personages
might
have brought secret and urgent pressure to bear u
nsuls. Had he firm allies or kinsmen among them, the course of events
might
have been different. 1 There is a mysterious cala
directly himself, with proconsular imperium. For the rest, proconsuls
might
govern, in appearance unhindered. Some would have
uxor)’ was buried in the sepulchre of the Crassi (CIL VI, 21308). She
might
be the first cousin of M. Licinius Crassus, cos.
he remained, though the appellation gradually faded from use. Yet he
might
have kept it, whatever the form of the constituti
5, 5. 3 Fasti 1, 613; 2, 60; 5, 145; 6, 92. Nor is this merely, as
might
be expected, with definite reference to the victo
piety. 2 He had founded—or was soon to found—the Roman State anew. He
might
therefore have been called Romulus, for the omen
at a distance, disposed on the periphery of the Empire—no threat, it
might
seem, to a free constitution, but merely guardian
to the Parthians, required careful supervision. Other regions in turn
might
be subjected to the same salutary treatment, for
velty, no scandal. The strictest champion of constitutional propriety
might
be constrained to concede their necessity. 1 If t
2 For such cumulation of powers a close parallel from the recent past
might
properly have been invoked: it is pretty clear th
called up and enlisted in the service of the revived Republic. Cicero
might
be more remunerative for every purpose; and the b
admitted, it was not for a princeps like Pompeius. For the rest, it
might
pertinently be urged that the political doctrine
rinceps nor any of his adherents desired change and disturbance. Well
might
he say, when asked his verdict on Cato, that anyb
iusto utamur domino, sed ut nullo. ` PageBook=>321 But Cicero
might
have changed, pliable to a changed order. So Brut
of ‘boni viri’ could ever produce an exemplary kind of citizen. Names
might
change: Augustus was none the less a revolutionar
p of military provinces. Definition of powers and extent of provincia
might
later be modified how and when he pleased. One th
he region in question and the men available—or safe to employ. 1 They
might
be ex-praetors or ex-consuls. Thus Pompeius Magnu
, were governed by proconsuls of consular rank. In the early years it
might
be expected that from time to time men of consula
he prosecution of the Prefect of Egypt. In Rome the Senate and People
might
enjoy the blessings of order and the semblance of
t preclude the attempt to reconstruct the true history of a year that
might
well have been the last, and was certainly the mo
reasons. If Caesar’s heir perished by disease or by the dagger, there
might
come again, as when Caesar the Dictator fell, dis
e ruler shunned the holding of a magistracy, his powers in public law
might
be described as magisterial, an impression which
izing the vast province of Galatia and Pamphylia. 2 Moreover the time
might
seem to be near for renewing diplomatic pressure
Syria was the only military province in the East except Egypt. Egypt
might
seem secure, governed by a viceroy of equestrian
the choice of Caesar’s legate to govern it. Conspiracy in the capital
might
be suppressed without causing disturbances: if ba
ssed without causing disturbances: if backed by a provincial army, it
might
mean civil war the Varro in charge of Syria was p
t is a process, not a series of acts, the establishment of the Empire
might
suitably be reckoned from this year. The legal
changes have been summarily described, the arguments indicated which
might
have been invoked for their public and plausible
ia (Dio 54, 5, 4 &c). 5 Dio 53, 32, 1. PageBook=>339 Men
might
recall another associate of Brutus, C. Antistius
o alienate all three. In alliance they had made him, in alliance they
might
destroy him. The marriage with Livia Drusilla h
the consulate ten years earlier than the legal provision. 1 Marcellus
might
well seem the destined heir, soon to succeed a fr
in gratitude, or even from friendship, the chorus of Maecenas’ poets
might
salute the munificent patron of letters, the pecu
the equestrian order modestly abiding within his station; the people
might
acclaim him in the theatre, in cheerful subservie
s charms which the poet Horace has so candidly depicted. 5 Maecenas
might
be dropped, but not Agrippa; and so Agrippa preva
t;343 Some at least of the perils which this critical year revealed
might
be countered if Augustus silenced rumour and baff
d rumour and baffled conspiracy by openly designating a successor. He
might
adopt his nephew. Such was perhaps his secret wis
es of Roman dynastic politics into the realm of pure monarchy; and it
might
end in wrecking the Caesarian party. In the sec
e character of Marcus Agrippa seems to lack colour and personality he
might
be the virtuous Aristides of Greek historians and
as destined for exhibition to a docile public. Dispassionate scrutiny
might
have detected certain cracks and stains on this A
der whom they all supported for Rome’s sake. The service of the State
might
be described as a ‘noble servitude’. For Agrippa,
whom her great-grandson called ‘the Roman Ulysses’. 1 For her son she
might
have selected an heiress from the most eminent fa
r, twin rulers of all the world, as a schematic and convenient theory
might
suggest. 4 Nor was Agrippa thereby unequivocally
hwarted its leader in the matter of Marcellus. Ultimately Marcellus
might
become Princeps, when age and merit qualified. Fo
ified. For the moment, it did not matter. Whatever the distant future
might
bring, a more urgent problem confronted the gover
and more. PageNote. 346 (No Notes) PageBook=>347 Augustus
might
not be a second Caesar: he lacked the vigour and
Again, Augustus had neither the taste nor the talent for war: Agrippa
might
be his minister, the organizer of victory and war
ula or the only system available. Indeed, for the empire of Rome it
might
be too narrow, especially as concerned provinces
present needs, with developments of the imagined future. Two emperors
might
one day be required or four. Yet the fabric must
bric must be held together. Two remedies were available. The Princeps
might
perambulate, visiting each part in turn. Augustus
the head of the Roman State and would be required in the capital. It
might
be desirable to convert the Principate into a par
aul and the Balkans, large regions with arduous tasks to be achieved,
might
clamour for competent rulers over a long period o
n service above all, military service. In this way a soldier’s family
might
rise through equestrian to senatorial rank in two
ise to the centurionate, but no higher. After service, it is true, he
might
be in possession of the equestrian census, and he
and of Crassus. 2 Balbus under Caesar in Spain, Mamurra in Gaul. It
might
also be conjectured that men like Ventidius, Salv
onfined to Egypt elsewhere for the needs of war an equestrian officer
might
be placed in temporary charge of a Roman legion.
t be placed in temporary charge of a Roman legion. 5 Military merit
might
also earn commendation or patronage for a post in
Praetorian Guard. Less important stages in an equestrian career that
might
culminate in the governorship of Egypt or the com
cluded from the highest distinction in the Free State. The novus homo
might
rise to the praetorship: to the consulate, howeve
mies would have said. Under the new regulations, access to the Senate
might
appear to have been made more difficult, being re
nepos’. Didia Decuma, daughter of Barbus, from Larinum (CIL IX, 751),
might
be related to this family. 2 There could scarce
But P. Ovidius Naso was not disposed to serve the Roman People. He
might
have become a lawyer, a Roman senator, a provinci
ives. The provincial recruited for service in the auxiliary regiments
might
receive the Roman citizenship as the reward of va
liable to misrepresentation. Of his acts, one of the most significant
might
appear to be his augmentation of the Senate by th
Princeps was not altogether a frank enthusiast for merit wherever it
might
be discovered and careless of class, but a small-
ies, cf. below, p. 394 f. PageBook=>374 Election by the people
might
be a mere form, but it could not be abolished by
atory or law, these were the three claims to the consulate. An orator
might
make mock of a jurist when urging a soldier’s cla
Picene intriguer, the loquacious Lollius Palicanus. 3 Service in war
might
find no higher reward than the praetorship, unles
sulate in 55 B.C.4 The Roman voter, free citizen of a free community,
might
elect whom he would: his suffrage went to ancestr
ghter of Valerius Messalla (for the stemma, see P-W III A, 2197). One
might
also infer a relationship with the Marcii Censori
iments into the equestris militia, thence perhaps into the Senate. It
might
be conjectured that the patriotic clubs (collegia
f the Italian towns had a definite role to play. Knights themselves
might
rank with senators in the New State or even above
servants of the Roman People, but aloof, majestic and heroic. Livia
might
seldom be visible in public save at religious cer
Hence and at this price a well ordered state such as Sulla and Caesar
might
have desired but could never have created. The po
PageBook=>387 THOUGH by no means as corrupt and inefficient as
might
hastily be imagined, the governing of all Italy a
rarchy of administration. In a sense, the consulars of the Republic
might
be designated as the government, ‘auctores public
ential and the minimum. An advance from the side of Gaul into Germany
might
shorten communications yet further, bind together
e manifest and alarming during the Triumviral period, that the Empire
might
split into two parts. By 13 B.C. a firm beginni
with no mention of M. Vinicius here or under 13 B.C. (54, 28, 1). It
might
be conjectured that Vinicius was proconsul of Ill
gustus gave Piso ‘secreta mandata’: in order that the legatus Augusti
might
override at need the proconsul of Macedonia? 4
Agrippa and of Taurus. Without the Claudii, however, the situation
might
well appear desperate for Princeps and for Empire
stus, Galatia was governed by legates of consular standing. 2 Galatia
might
suitably rank as a frontier province; in the paci
Senate in 27 B.C. was likewise neither final nor systematic. Augustus
might
be requested by the Senate either to nominate a p
rty-three did not have to wait too long for a province Africa or Asia
might
be his by the working of the lot after an interva
ally summoned to the general’s council. Again, the equestrian officer
might
turn out to be a valuable person, with long years
ary cavalry. 6 After the quaestorship or the praetorship, the senator
might
command a legion this post was no innovation, but
nces were political rather than administrative. The legate of Syria
might
be a menace to the government in Rome. NotesPag
e date of his command is probably 9–6 B.C. (P-W I A, 1519 ff.). There
might
be room for another legate between Titius and Sen
ff., with a slight preference for the former alternative: the latter
might
seem more plausible. Further, the consular legate
e most, a stray proconsul of Africa, fighting under his own auspices,
might
assume the title of imperator. 6 Before long that
give their names to cities, and that was in far Cilicia. No senator
might
depart from Italy and visit the provinces, save p
the most part the name of the reigning dynasty of imperial Rome. Nor
might
grateful natives any more exalt a patron with div
career in the service of the State. The principes of the Free State
might
take counsel together, in a more or less public f
e restored than Augustus hastened to palliate any inconveniences that
might
arise from that alarming novelty. He instructed t
net an organ of administration, not of authority. As it was there, it
might
suitably be employed by the Princeps as a group o
igula and Claudius: they had been there for a long time. 8 Senators
might
preside over the treasury, but the Senate had no
convenient and docile committee? The auctoritas of a senior statesman
might
be suitably invoked to express or to guide the op
r guidance, from above and from behind. The care of the national cult
might
appeal to the antiquarian, the administrator or t
ar and peace. 2 That was not necessary. Embassies from foreign powers
might
be introduced to the Senate after a suitable rehe
to the Senate after a suitable rehearsal. The assembly of the People
might
declare war but the People did not decide against
not decide against whom; the wars, however grandiose and arduous they
might
be, were not always dignified with that name and
r dissimulantes fuissent’ (ib. 4). PageBook=>414 The historian
might
with no less propriety have turned his talents to
in public. With the death of Augustus, the Princeps’ powers lapsed he
might
designate, but he could not appoint, his heir. Wh
e of Nerva by its impotence threatened to precipitate a civil war. It
might
be conjectured that the danger was averted by a v
us’ design beneficial to the Roman People? Of that, a patriotic Roman
might
have his doubts. The New State was fast turning i
ne of their own number. Augustus knew it. The ambition of the nobiles
might
have appeared the most serious menace to his rule
ple, the master of the legions, the king of kings. For all that, they
might
flourish in the shadow of the monarchy, prosecute
much, perhaps, to hope for the power themselves but their descendants
might
have a chance or a portion. The Princeps might di
but their descendants might have a chance or a portion. The Princeps
might
die. Yet the princes Gaius and Lucius remained, a
Claudian connexion were in low water: Tiberius lived on in exile and
might
never return. On her own side of the family she l
never return. On her own side of the family she lacked relatives who
might
be built up into a faction. 2 To be sure, there w
ction the disgrace on his daughter? The influence and hand of Livia
might
have been suspected, bearing heavily on the Julii
true principal was probably Iullus Antonius. The son of the Triumvir
might
well be politically dangerous. Like the early Chr
bunicia potestas; and he was still the Princeps’ son-in-law. Augustus
might
think that he knew his Tiberius. Still, he prefer
sis in Rome, supervening when the first man in the Empire was absent,
might
turn into a political catastrophe. Against that r
of body and intractable temper which he had inherited from his father
might
have been schooled in the discipline of the camp
nexions. 4 A new party becomes discernible, dual in composition, as
might
be expected. In the six years following the retur
t upon the first citizen for services rendered and expected. The task
might
appear too great for any one man but Augustus alo
ight appear too great for any one man but Augustus alone, a syndicate
might
appear preferable to a principate:5 none the less
efore. 1 Augustus was ruthless for the good of the Roman People. Some
might
affect to believe him unwilling to contemplate th
security and the ambition of a few men. Cicero and his contemporaries
might
boast of the libertas which the Roman People enjo
metas rerum nec tempora pono: imperium sine fine dedi. 1 The Greeks
might
have their Alexander it was glorious, but it was
It was a danger and a responsibility. By its unwieldy mass the Empire
might
come crashing to the ground, involving Rome in th
stored? About the efficacy of moral and sumptuary legislation there
might
well be doubts, if men reflected on human nature
, the epitaph in lapide hoc uni nupta fuisse legar. 6 Though some
might
show a certain restraint in changing husbands or
ht land. Though a number of these men may have practised commerce and
might
be called town-dwellers, especially the freedman
om the ideal of economic self-sufficiency. The old-fashioned moralist
might
rejoice. Let foreign trade decline it brought no
oney went into landed property. Large estates grew larger. Prosperity
might
produce qualms no less than did adversity. Horace
les, where nature provided all fruits without the work of man’s hand,
might
meditate for a moment on the evils of private pro
en (CIL XI, 600: Forum Livi). PageBook=>452 The patriotic poet
might
deplore the seizure of plough-land for princely p
ke Lollius, Quirinius and Tarius Rufus. With such champions, property
might
rest secure. The author of the most eloquent co
One of them came of a noble Samnite family now reconciled to Rome: it
might
be added that the other was a Picene. That was no
ember of the Italian middle class. No less genuine his patriotism: it
might
be guessed that his favourite line of verse was
gnant to sentiment. It was pietas, the typical Roman virtue. Augustus
might
observe with some satisfaction that he had restor
in laxity of individual behaviour; and ability, courage or patriotism
might
lend to vice itself a certain specious charm. Aug
ion of taste. 3 If Augustus was disappointed in the aristocracy, he
might
reflect that Rome was not Italy; and Italy had be
received the Roman citizenship equally Roman before the law. Gades
might
export dancing-girls or a millionaire like Balbus
there were many other towns in Spain and Gallia Narbonensis that soon
might
send to Rome their local aristocrats, well traine
loyalty to the State. Agrícola was the civil servant of whom Augustus
might
well have dreamed. PageNotes. 455 1 Suetonius
acing atmosphere, under the watchword of duty and morality, Lucretius
might
perhaps have satisfied the fervour of a religious
ble origin. Whatever racial differences the curious or the uncritical
might
be disposed to infer between Mantua, in legend a
, were transcended in a common national devotion to Rome. Further, as
might
be expected of a region that had only recently be
of consular standing. 7 Like his kinsman, C. Propertius Postumus, he
might
have aspired to senatorial rank. PageNotes. 466
hat knew and honoured the majesty of death and the dead. Propertius
might
have been a highly remunerative investment for Ma
be useful. Ovid accepted that principle and turned it inside out. He
might
have instructed the youth of Rome to honour the p
propaganda. 9 When the man of the people turned a coin in his palm he
might
meditate on the aspirations or the achievements o
ollo, his patron. 1 Other materials were available. The loyal citizen
might
gaze upon Augustus in the shape of the young revo
his virtues and his attributes could be suitably celebrated. Worship
might
not be paid to the man but to the divine power wi
mperor and could make another; and the change from Republic to Empire
might
be described as the provinces’ revenge upon Rome.
purged of evil habits and solaced by generous subsidies, the populace
might
still assert for itself the right of free speech,
was a graver danger than the dagger of a casual assassin, whether he
might
be a misguided man of the people or a vindictive
riptions and the most abominable actions of the Triumvirs. The people
might
be fooled and fed, the knights persuaded to disgu
st the Principate but against the Princeps. PageBook=>480 That
might
be doubted. The person and habits of Augustus wer
formly and ostentatiously homespun. As with Pompeius, face and mien
might
be honest and comely. 2 What lay behind the mask?
cisely so in earlier wars, had it been possible. 4 As for Actium, men
might
remember the killing of young Curio; and the very
erty flattered their authors without alarming the government; and men
might
still read without danger the opprobrious epistle
ass from Antonius to Octavianus, the statement is not as daring as it
might
appear, but is rather a subtle compliment. It was
ical intrigue. Augustus was invulnerable. Not so his friends: a trial
might
be the occasion either of a direct attack upon th
5 Augustus and Pollio were crisp, hard, unsentimental men. Augustus
might
permit the cult of Cicero for his own purposes. Y
of independence. PageNotes. 486 1 The Transatlantic term ‘uplift’
might
give a hint of the meaning. 2 For particulars,
;488 It was impossible to tell the truth about the living, but hate
might
have its revenge upon the dead. Hence the contras
al platitude became a wild paradox under the Empire. Augustus’ memory
might
be safe after death to attack or traduce the Foun
had prevailed at Philippi or Antonius at Actium, the ultimate result
might
have been much the same for the Domitii: prominen
xt to Antonius for leadership in his party. To the Domitii, primacy
might
be delayed, but not denied for ever. The complex
nder Domitian and under Hadrian. 9 For prudence and for success, it
might
have seemed that all would be outdone by the Cocc
ealthy or insinuating, devoted to the government whoever the Princeps
might
be. The son of the consular Passienus, adopted by
ated his unswerving loyalty ’pietatis immobilis erga principem’. 2 It
might
have been set up under any reign. Such men deserv
on of a Roman knight. 2 But for this defect of birth, Verginius Rufus
might
have become emperor. 3 Nero and his advisers had
e from a lower and commercial order of society, the Roman knights. He
might
have to sink further yet, to make his peace, thro
, with the procedure of a nominally independent Senate. The nobiles
might
savour a brief taste of revenge when scandal and
t of commissions to Greeks in the militia equestris. 1 The movement
might
only be accelerated by ‘bad emperors’ or masterfu
ession of Tiberius Caesar down to the end of Nero. Period and subject
might
also be described as ‘The Decline and Fall of the
the aristocracy was degraded and persecuted. The record of their ruin
might
be instructive it was not a happy task for an his
etence in the race for wealth and power. The nobilis, less obtrusive,
might
be no better. After a social revolution the prima
ealed by Horace’s charming ode and by the loyal effusions of Ovid, he
might
not stand in such startling contrast to his son,
he parent of despotism. The rule of law had perished long ago, with
might
substituted for right. The contest for power in t
o Rome. ‘Acriora ex eo vincula’, as Tacitus observes. 4 The New State
might
be called monarchy, or by any other name. That di
made to apply it in practice, for fear of something worse: sober men
might
well ponder on the apparent ridicule and solid ad
legions. That was over. The Republic was something that a prudent man
might
admire but not imitate: as a wicked opportunist o
litical dissensions at home, was a splendid subject for history. Well
might
Tacitus look back with melancholy and complain th
and untrammelled eloquence of the closing days of the Republic. 4 He
might
pause when he reflected that great oratory is a s
of the East. The Romans had not sunk as low as that. Complete freedom
might
be unworkable, but complete enslavement was intol
and ostentatious opposition of certain candidates for martyrdom, who
might
be admired for Republican independence of spirit
em. They had been selfish dynasts, but he was ‘salubris princeps’. He
might
easily have adopted the title of ‘Optimus princep
intra luminis oras. 6 Augustus’ relation to the Roman Commonwealth
might
also be described as organic rather than arbitrar
. ’1 So Tacitus described the Empire and its armed forces. The phrase
might
fittingly be applied to the whole fabric of the R
y and continuous. It had been Augustus’ most fervent prayer that he
might
lay the foundations of the new order deep and sec
at from among the principes, by general consent capable of Empire. It
might
have been better for Tiberius and for Rome if Aug
tality. 3 During the Spanish wars, when stricken by an illness that
might
easily have been the end of a frail life, Augustu
are defined as legal and magisterial; and he excels any colleague he
might
have, not in potestas, but only in auctoritas. 3
ficiently regarded. PageBook=>524 While the Princeps lived, he
might
, like other rulers, be openly worshipped as a dei