, sons of Roman knights. Of the latter, in the main deriving from the
local
aristocracies, the holders of property, power and
e with impunity. 1 Pompeius was also related to other families of the
local
gentry, the men of substance in the municipia of
Sanquinii recalls the Sabine god Sancus; Cicero’s friend Visidius, a
local
dynast somewhere in central Italy, bears a kindre
here, an altar and a traditional religious observance. 6 Of certain
local
dynastic families it could in truth be proved as
o a Latin flexion; but praenomen or cognomen sometimes recalled their
local
and alien provenance. 4 In strife for power at Ro
s wherever they might be found. They spread their influence among the
local
aristocracies by marriage or alliance, northwards
nservative demagogue Livius Drusus, a friend and associate of certain
local
dynasts,2 the Italians took up arms. It was not t
or non-combatants it was complicated and embittered by the strife of
local
factions. Etruria and Umbria, though wavering, ha
; and many Italians had no use for it. Loyalties were still personal,
local
and regional. A hundred thousand veterans, settle
ollowing in Picenum:3 but these were only the personal adherents of a
local
dynast and Roman politician, or the Roman faction
tin termination not so the more recent, with foreign endings; and the
local
distribution of the non-Latin gentile names of It
of Latium in the vicinity of Rome, they gathered adherents’ from the
local
aristocracies. 2 The degree of sympathy for the R
nus may well have been an equestrian officer in Caesar’s army. On the
local
distribution of names in ‘-enus’ see Schulze, LE,
rs, unscrupulous freedmen, ambitious sons of ruined families from the
local
gentry of the towns of Italy. The hazards were pa
ica. The possession of Africa at this time was dubious, disputed in a
local
civil war for several years. 5 As for the islands
d and consolidated the Caesarian party. Yet there were personal and
local
causes everywhere. Under guise of partisan zeal,
e of the proscribed were saved by civic virtue, personal influence or
local
patriotism. The citizens of Cales manned the wall
a Volscian town, perhaps not of senatorial rank. 3 A large number of
local
aristocrats supported Caesar; 4 and some will hav
murderous street battles between soldiers and civilians. 4 Towns and
local
magnates armed in self-protection. The opposition
losses through desperate valour at Thapsus and Munda; and princes or
local
dynasts in foreign lands had lapsed by now to the
, a freedman,2 the others, however, sons of wealthy families from the
local
aristocracies in the towns of the North Verona, B
er all Italy, but rather the culmination in the summer of a series of
local
agitations, which, though far from unconcerted, p
ne or military dynast. Such at least was the plea and profession. The
local
gentry, who controlled the policy of the towns, c
d the policy of the towns, could create opinion, produce votes of the
local
senates and facilitate by money or by moral suasi
d not exist. Private influence and private ties, casual corruption or
local
intimidation were not enough. Lack of conviction
and defender and were firmly attached to his clientela. For the rest,
local
dynasts exerted their influence to induce the mun
ause seventeen years later may perhaps be put down to the agency of a
local
office-holding family, the Ovidii. 3 The soldie
ilitary colonies were the chief support of Octavianus’ power; and the
local
magnates, whether Roman colonists and business me
. A neglected passage in Josephus (BJ 1, 324, cf. AJ 14, 449) attests
local
recruiting in Syria in 38 B.C. 2 Dio so, 14, 1
nators were not all tenderly to be spared out of respect for dignity:
local
magnates of the Antonian faction in the towns of
ity: local magnates of the Antonian faction in the towns of Italy had
local
enemies. A number of victims of the purge proba
escent unbroken from gods and heroes, or at least from a long line of
local
magnates, bound by ties of blood and marriage to
ristocracies of Campania and Samnium. One side of his family, Samnite
local
gentry, stood by Rome in the Bellum Italicum: a d
erations of Tiberius in 12–9 B.C. were confined to the suppression of
local
rebellions. 3 Dio 54, 20, 1 f. (under 16 B.C.);
their towns (perhaps ex-magistrates). 2 The municipia, or rather the
local
dynasts who controlled them, were sufficiently aw
ns in Spain and Gallia Narbonensis that soon might send to Rome their
local
aristocrats, well trained in ‘provincialis parsim
the transgressions of the wealthy. Rome seldom intervened against the
local
dynasts. C. Julius Eurycles, the lord of Sparta a
ustus, the introduction of a regular assessment (13-12 B.C.) provoked
local
disturbances. 1 The proconsuls and publicani of
with the army and with the Roman People. 1 Hence the veterans and the
local
dynasts would sharply have dealt with social disc
ch showed traces of his native dialect. Pollio himself may have had a
local
accent. Nor was the judgement merely one of style
s, 8 f., 15, 26, 38, 250, 315, 324, 370, 441 f., 490 f., 515, 522 f.;
local
, 82 f., 89, 91 f., 289, 292, 360 ff., etc. East,
449 f., 453, 465 f.; unification of, 86 ff., 286 ff., 359, 365, 450;
local
families in, 10, 31, 82 ff., 356, 359; see also B
urator and praefectus Aegypti, 356, 383, 411, 437. Magius, Minatus,
local
dynast from Aeclanum, 82, 88, 383. Magnates, se
80; altar at, 473. Narcissus, imperial freedman, 386. Narnia, 200; a
local
god at, 83. Nasidius, Q., Pompeian and Antonian
n military commands, 502 ff. Nola, siege of, 87. Nomenclature, of
local
Italian families, 83 f.; non-Latin, types of, 93
y Caesar, 68; on Caesar’s side, 68 f.; ideals and ‘values’ of, 69 f.;
local
origins of, 84; liberalism of, 70, 345; patrician
. 45), 500, 504. Plebeians, 10, 68; great plebeian families, 19 f.;
local
origins, 84 f. Plebs, venality and Caesarian se
ndition of, under Augustus, 450. Sancus, Sabine god, 83. Sanquinii,
local
family, 83. Sardinia, in the Triumviral period,
lius Varro, C. (cos. suff. A.D. 12), novus homo, 363. Visidius, L.,
local
magnate, 82; his origin and family-god, 83; prote