l war. The history of this age is highly controversial, the learned
literature
overwhelming in bulk. I have been driven to mak
eptional favour may be largely assigned to one thing the influence of
literature
when studied in isolation from history. The writi
dead became a god and a myth, passing from the realm of history into
literature
and legend, declamation and propaganda. By August
te who restored the Republic. In its treatment of Caesar the inspired
literature
of the Augustan Principate is consistent and inst
o scope for talent or ideas on the other side. The newer movements in
literature
were sponsored by a brilliant circle of orators a
yalty to Roman standards of conduct with a lively appreciation of the
literature
and philosophy of Hellas: he was the friend and p
that might have brought Cicero and Caesar together a common taste for
literature
, to which Pompeius was notoriously alien, and com
ng him back upon himself, had then sought and created consolations in
literature
and in theory: the ideal derived its shape from h
d irrelevant pleading. The private virtues of Cicero, his rank in the
literature
of Rome, and his place in the history of civiliza
9 IN Rome of the Republic, not constrained by any law of libel, the
literature
of politics was seldom dreary, hypocritical or ed
n the unimpeachable Philodemus from Gadara, a town in high repute for
literature
and learning. 10 Antonius had attacked Dolabella,
y as a whole. An aspiration rather than a programme. If the political
literature
of the period had been more abundantly preserved,
gered until too late. His murder disgraced the Triumvirs and enriched
literature
with an immortal theme. 1 But the fugitives cou
C. (Plutarch, Cato Minor 35). The name ‘Canidius’, familiar enough to
literature
from Horace’s witch Canidia, is exceedingly rare:
thousand years; it has been aggravated by a hazard to which prophetic
literature
by its very nature is peculiarly liable, that of
ic library known at Rome for to Libertas Pollio ever paid homage, and
literature
meant more to him than war and politics; Sosius (
ion. Men turned to the care of property and family, to the studies of
literature
and philosophy. From the official religion of the
he preceding generation. Fashions had altered rapidly. A truly modern
literature
, disdaining the caprice of individual tastes in l
divine providence; ancient legends could be employed to advertise in
literature
and on monuments the glory and the traditions of
es and influential outside them. 4 Dominant in politics, commerce and
literature
, these men formed and propagated the public opini
all. Antonius the enslaved sensualist belongs to popular and edifying
literature
. Cleopatra was neither young nor beautiful. 3 But
of Cleopatra there is no doubt: her importance in history, apart from
literature
and legend, is another matter. It NotesPage=>
l at once. Princeps remained also and very truly Dux, as the poetical
literature
of the earliest years of the new dispensation une
r when an official historian sought to refute Sallustius. The tone of
literature
in the Augustan age is certainly Pompeian rather
raditional concepts and the consecrated vocabulary of Roman political
literature
, much of it, indeed, in no way peculiar to Cicero
ense of disquiet and insecurity, still to be detected in contemporary
literature
. The past was recent and tangible the Ides of Mar
nate naming Augustus the Father of his Country. 3 Religion, law and
literature
all came under guidance, from above and from behi
l had gone eleven years before. In the last period of Augustus’ rule,
literature
not merely languished from the loss of its shinin
he duties of war and government, the sciences, the fine arts and mere
literature
were clearly superfluous, when not positively nox
influenced by the intellectual movements of the capital, by Hellenic
literature
, science or scepticism. He was capable of dissimu
N PageBook=>459 IN Rome of the Republic the aristocracy guided
literature
through individual patronage. As in politics, the
blame of the dead rather than the living foreshadows the sad fate of
literature
under the Empire. When the rule of Augustus is
national antiquities. As yet, however, no systematic exploitation of
literature
on the grand scale. That was left for Augustus. P
rts and by the best poets. 3 The Princeps succeeded: other patrons of
literature
were left far behind. Pollio lost his Virgil. M
something much greater was afoot, the deliberate creation of a Roman
literature
worthy to stand beside the achievement of Greece,
lier and classic exemplars, to the great age of Greece. The new Roman
literature
was designed to be civic rather than individual,
and to claim the rank of classics for the better sort of contemporary
literature
. As in politics, the last generation was not ri
ls a gravity and depth of feeling beside which much of the ceremonial
literature
of Augustan Rome appears hard, flashy and hollow.
he Corinna of the Amores cannot match Propertius’ Cynthia. Corinna is
literature
, a composite or rather an imaginary figure. The p
k=>484 The fashion quickly spread and propagated a disease among
literature
in both prose and verse, a scourge in the social
been underestimated. Even Agrippa took up the pen. 3 Paramount in the
literature
of apology stood Augustus’ own autobiographical m
rs of Augustus witnessed stern measures of repression against noxious
literature
. 5 Public bonfires were instituted but not for su
for such trifles as the Ars amatoria of Ovid. Contemporary political
literature
provided the cause and the fuel. Thus did Augustu
confirmed by Juvenal and by Tacitus, the typical glories of imperial
literature
and the last of the Romans. PageNotes. 489 1
nd Plancus were Messalla and Pollio, the consular patrons of Augustan
literature
, themselves no mean part of it. The Roman patrici
completely renovated, with new institutions, new ideas and even a new
literature
that was already classical. The doom of Empire ha
nts, 496 ff., 500; character and bibulous habits, 436; as a patron of
literature
, 460. Calpurnius Piso Frugi Licinianus, L., ado
, 376, 377, 379, 420, 421, 425, 487; his oratory, 375; as a patron of
literature
, 460; proconsul of Asia, 375, 395, 405, 474; in S
90 f. Greece, in relation to Roman patriotism, 440, 449; and Roman
literature
, 461. Greeks, conciliated by Antonius, 262 f.;
er the Triumvirs, 247 ff.; under the Principate, 459 ff.; political
literature
, 149 ff., 486; opposition literature, 486 f.; cre
Principate, 459 ff.; political literature, 149 ff., 486; opposition
literature
, 486 f.; creation of a classical literature at Ro
149 ff., 486; opposition literature, 486 f.; creation of a classical
literature
at Rome, 461; repression of, 486; decline of, 487