notable exception. To one of the unsuccessful champions of political
liberty
sympathy has seldom been denied. Cicero was a hum
e. The Roman and the senator could never surrender his prerogative of
liberty
or frankly acknowledge the drab merits of absolut
s every party and every leader professed to be defending the cause of
liberty
and of peace. Those ideals were incompatible. Whe
more recently claimed to be asserting the rights of the tribunes, the
liberty
of the Roman People. He was not mistaken. Yet he
uld survive if its members refused to abide by the rules, to respect ‘
liberty
and the laws’. To his contemporaries, Marcus Br
inus opened the fray with the battle-cry of Caesar’s dignitas and the
liberty
of the Roman People. 5 In his dispatches Caesar d
oman State, They had no further plans the tyrant was slain, therefore
liberty
was restored. A lull followed and bewilderment.
Though Rome and the army were degenerate and Caesarian, respect for
liberty
, for tradition, and for the constitution might ap
r was dead, regretted by many, but not to be avenged; an assertion of
liberty
had been answered by the Caesarian leaders with c
rds, old and new, with their insistence upon civic virtue or personal
liberty
, accorded a wide indulgence. The failings of Anto
unced. 2 The lust for power ends in tyranny, which is the negation of
liberty
, the laws and of all civilized life. 3 So much fo
s last and courageous battle for what he believed to be the Republic,
liberty
and the laws against the forces of anarchy or des
recalled not Caesar only but Lepidus and armies raised in the name of
liberty
, the deeds of Pompeius, and a Brutus besieged at
he deceitful assertions of a party who claimed to be the champions of
liberty
and the laws, of peace and legitimate government.
exploiting the constitution in its own interests. Hence the appeal to
liberty
. It was on this plea that the young Pompeius rais
their lives for intriguers such as Plancus or Lepidus, still less for
liberty
and the constitution, empty names. Roman discipli
crown and consecration to any process of violence and usurpation. But
liberty
, the laws and the constitution were NotesPage=&
nvoking on the side of insurgents the authority of the Senate and the
liberty
of the People. Cicero spoke before the People as
State. Henceforth nothing but a contest of despots over the corpse of
liberty
. The men who fell at Philippi fought for a princi
y degenerated were fought at the expense of Italy. Denied justice and
liberty
, Italy rose against Rome for the last time. It wa
ctor of Philippi was overwhelming. On the other side, they championed
liberty
and the rights of the dispossessed again not with
y senators and Roman knights of distinction had espoused the cause of
liberty
and the protection of their own estates. It may b
ten against the Triumvirs. Their iron rule in Italy, while it crushed
liberty
, had at least maintained a semblance of peace in
nst Antonius, winning for personal domination the name and pretext of
liberty
. The young military leader awoke to a new confi
he gifted and eloquent Messalla, ‘fulgentissimus iuvenis’, fought for
liberty
at Philippi and was proud of it. He then followed
t ascension and domination of Pompeius, that was the end of political
liberty
. Sallustius studied and imitated the classic do
though it were not fettered to the policy of a military despot. To
liberty
itself the Republic was now recalled, bewildered
ould be a brave man, or a very foolish one, who asserted the cause of
liberty
anywhere in the vicinity of Calvisius Sabinus or
t despotism was already there and war inevitable. In a restoration of
liberty
no man could believe any more. Yet if the coming
d of the factions, compacts and wars of the last thirty years, though
liberty
perished, peace might be achieved. It was worth i
has triumphed in civil war, it claims to have asserted the ideals of
liberty
and concord. Peace was a tangible blessing. For a
er the immediate rule of Octavianus presented a fair show of restored
liberty
, and resigned nothing of value. Ostensible modera
s of the supreme magistrates, Augustus and Agrippa. The transition to
liberty
was carefully safeguarded. It is an entertainin
with Caesar. Sick of words and detesting the champions of oligarchic
liberty
, the peoples of the Marsi, the Marrucini and the
other, his grandfather had helped Ti. Claudius Nero in the fight for
liberty
during the Bellum Perusinum and committed suicide
If Augustus wished his rule to retain the semblance of constitutional
liberty
, with free elections and free debate in the Senat
of a prosperous age, based upon the convenient dogma that it retained
liberty
while discarding licence and achieved order witho
ely the publication of books extolling Cato, the martyr of Republican
liberty
. The praise or blame of the dead rather than the
stus’ policy or an unequivocal testimony to the restoration of public
liberty
; but it does not follow that the poets and histor
ey had known worse, and could see no prospect of a successful war for
liberty
against the legions and colonies of Rome. In orig
s nobis male facere possit. ’ PageBook=>482 These outbursts of
liberty
flattered their authors without alarming the gove
ook up arms against the State. But Cato was worshipped as a martyr of
liberty
. Augustus conceived a genial device for thwarting
ied the history of Republican Rome. That was not the worst. Political
liberty
had to go, for the sake of the Commonwealth. But
bertas was destroyed when Virtus was shattered at Philippi. Political
liberty
, it could be maintained, was doomed if not dead l
the Roman People. There is something more important than political
liberty
; and political rights are a means, not an end in
bid and restless, with noble qualities as well as evil the strife for
liberty
, glory or domination. 1 Empire, wealth and indivi
ence could not have the advantage both ways, enjoying both Republican
liberty
and the benefits of an ordered state. Nor was the
ibertas in Roman thought and usage had never quite meant unrestricted
liberty
; and the ideal which the word now embodied was th
e, there must surely be a middle path between the extremes of ruinous
liberty
and degrading servility. A sensible man could fin
dria paid public observance to him who was the author of their lives,
liberty
and prosperity. 8 NotesPage=>519 1 Augustu
516 ff.; as the best form of government, 516, 518; as a guarantee of
liberty
, 518; and concord, 9, 263, 519. Money, power of