t Clodia was the wife of L. Licinius Lucullus (cos. 74), who divorced
her
, making shocking allegations (Plutarch, Lucullus
mbition of the patrician Servilii and ruthless to recapture power for
her
house. 5 Her brother, Q. Servilius, husband of
useful orator. Terentia, Cicero’s wife, afraid lest he should divorce
her
and marry Clodia, provoked a breach by making Cic
he nor Caesar were predestined partisans of Pompeius. Servilia reared
her
son to hate Pompeius, schemed for the Caesarian a
by Servilia, who worked steadily to restore the dignity and power of
her
family. In her dynastic policy she ruthlessly emp
ho worked steadily to restore the dignity and power of her family. In
her
dynastic policy she ruthlessly employed the three
In her dynastic policy she ruthlessly employed the three daughters of
her
second husband, whom she gave in marriage to C. C
change. In Egypt Caesar could support a candidate, Cleopatra, against
her
sister and the ministers of the Ptolemaic Court;
, themselves for the most part of alien origin. When Alba Longa fell,
her
gods and her ruling families were transplanted to
for the most part of alien origin. When Alba Longa fell, her gods and
her
ruling families were transplanted to Rome: hence
umph had ever been celebrated whether they fought against Rome or for
her
. 4 The Marsi provided the first impulsion to the
sius was resentful and truculent, Brutus undecided. Servilia promised
her
influence to get the measure revoked. No other de
ius, Brutus’ agent, had arrived at Rome. Servilia promised to pass on
her
information to Cicero, who was jubilant ‘videtur
erited his policy and his character; and Clodia committed incest with
her
brother and poisoned her husband. The enormities
character; and Clodia committed incest with her brother and poisoned
her
husband. The enormities of P. Vatinius ranged fro
. Would that all good men and champions of Rome’s empire might become
her
citizens! Where a man came from did not matter at
ine Clusinius (Quintilian 7, 2, 26), and Pollio subsequently defended
her
heirs in a famous lawsuit. 7 Namely L. Quinctiu
nd professions of pietas. 2 Fulvia, if anybody, knew the character of
her
husband: he neither would nor could go back upon
g, if not by destroying, the rival Caesarian leader, and thus win for
her
absent and unsuspecting consort the sole power wh
s, exaggerated the role of Fulvia both at the time and later, putting
her
person and her acts in a hateful light; and there
the role of Fulvia both at the time and later, putting her person and
her
acts in a hateful light; and there was nobody aft
was nobody afterwards, from piety or even from perversity, to redeem
her
memory. (For a temperate view of Fulvia, the last
ummoned an important vassal, the Queen of Egypt, to render account of
her
policy. 2 Cleopatra was alert and seductive. 3
od will but did not surrender. The Queen, who was able to demonstrate
her
loyalty to the Caesarian party, received confirma
onstrate her loyalty to the Caesarian party, received confirmation in
her
possessions and departed. Antonius, making necess
us Octavia, left a widow with an infant son by the opportune death of
her
husband, C. Marcellus, in this year. Such was t
n, no foreign foe had been able to destroy Rome. Her own strength and
her
own sons laid her low. 1 The war of class against
had been able to destroy Rome. Her own strength and her own sons laid
her
low. 1 The war of class against class, the domina
to become a father. The sister of Octavianus had a son, Marcellus, by
her
consular husband; but Marcellus was born two year
nces with his young and beautiful bride and spent the winter of 39 in
her
company, enjoying the unwonted pleasures of domes
e mediation of Octavia was invoked to secure an accommodation between
her
brother and her husband or so at least it was all
ctavia was invoked to secure an accommodation between her brother and
her
husband or so at least it was alleged, in order t
. He may already have tired of Octavia. Anything that reminded him of
her
brother must have been highly distasteful. His fu
2 M. Aemilius Scaurus was the son of Mucia, Pompeius’ third wife, by
her
second husband. Sex. Pompeius had married a daugh
nd influential connexions. Herself in the direct line of the Claudii (
her
father, slain at Philippi, was a Claudius adopted
ompeius, for L. Antonius and the Republic in the War of Perusia. With
her
husband and the child Tiberius, Livia fled from t
m of Scribonia’s husbands, intensified by Suetonius when he describes
her
as ‘nuptam ante duobus consularibus’ (Divus Aug.
of C. Memmius (pr. 58 B.C.) and of Fausta, Sulla’s daughter (Milo was
her
second husband). Ch. XVIII ROME UNDER THE TRIUM
heir place, Etruscan or Umbrian, Picene or Lucanian. 4 Rome had known
her
novi homines for three centuries now, admitted in
is passion and ostensible source of his inspiration (he had inherited
her
from another),6 NotesPage=>252 1 Above, p.
ost wealthy of the Roman vassals, the Queen of Egypt: he had not seen
her
for nearly four years. Fonteius brought her to An
of Egypt: he had not seen her for nearly four years. Fonteius brought
her
to Antioch, where they spent the winter of the ye
leopatra received no greater accession than did other dynasts ; 2 but
her
portion was exceedingly rich. Her revenues were a
continuous territory northwards into Syria. Antonius refused to give
her
any more. These grants do not seem to have exci
ndour and wealth, though not in military power. She had reconstituted
her
heritage, now possessing the realm of Ptolemy Phi
n the high-sounding names of Alexander Helios and Cleopatra Selene; 2
her
next child was to bear the historic and significa
venty ships: of ships Antonius had no need. Octavia was instructed by
her
brother to bring a body of two thousand picked me
structed by her brother to bring a body of two thousand picked men to
her
husband. Antonius was confronted with damaging
rown forward as a pawn in the game of high politics, to the profit of
her
brother, whichever way the adversary moved. 3 Ant
epted the troops. Octavia had come as far as Athens. Her husband told
her
to go back to Rome, unchivalrous for the first ti
south and south-east, Rome was secure on that flank and could direct
her
full effort towards the north or the north-east,
&c. (Cinna): Cinna was the son of Pompeia, daughter of Magnus, by
her
second marriage, namely, with L. Cornelius Cinna,
he domination which Cleopatra had achieved over him and the nature of
her
own ambitions. A fabricated concatenation of unre
,1 but when he abode there as consort of Egypt’s Queen, the father of
her
children who were crowned kings and queens, his d
273 1 W. W. Tarn, CAH x, 81. The rulers of Egypt were Cleopatra and
her
eldest son Ptolemy Caesar (alleged son of the Dic
h Cleopatra it was different: she was a goddess as well as a queen in
her
own right. The assumption of divinity presented a
llow that he was merely a tool in the hands of Cleopatra, beguiled by
her
beauty or dominated by her intellect. His positio
ool in the hands of Cleopatra, beguiled by her beauty or dominated by
her
intellect. His position was awkward if he did not
ward if he did not placate the Queen of Egypt he would have to depose
her
. Yet he was quite able to repel her insistent att
of Egypt he would have to depose her. Yet he was quite able to repel
her
insistent attempts to augment her kingdom at the
her. Yet he was quite able to repel her insistent attempts to augment
her
kingdom at the expense of Judaea. There is no sig
e dangerous forms of domination he may have succumbed to the power of
her
imagination and her understanding. Yet that is no
domination he may have succumbed to the power of her imagination and
her
understanding. Yet that is not proved. Antonius w
urate a new universal kingdom. 4 In this deep design Antonius was but
her
dupe and her agent. Of the ability of Cleopatra
niversal kingdom. 4 In this deep design Antonius was but her dupe and
her
agent. Of the ability of Cleopatra there is no
dupe and her agent. Of the ability of Cleopatra there is no doubt:
her
importance in history, apart from literature and
II (1932), 141; CAH x, 82 f. PageBook=>275 is not certain that
her
ambition was greater than this, to secure and aug
ertain that her ambition was greater than this, to secure and augment
her
Ptolemaic kingdom under the protection of Rome. T
man now much more than an accident in the contest, inevitable without
her
, between the two Caesarian leaders. Failing Cleop
without her, between the two Caesarian leaders. Failing Cleopatra and
her
children, Octavianus would have been reduced to i
Armenia was outweighed by the donations of Antonius to Cleopatra and
her
children, a vulnerable point for hostile attack i
Cleopatra or no Cleopatra. But the Queen was there: Antonius stood as
her
ally, whatever the nature of the tie that bound t
rough against the blandishments of Cleopatra, refusing even to salute
her
with the title of ‘Queen’:2 Republican principle,
s Plancus, who set himself to win the favour of Cleopatra, pronounced
her
the winner in a famed if not fabulous wager with
Cleopatra and directed that, when he died, he should be buried beside
her
in Alexandria. 2 The signal was given for a ren
the most eloquent of the Romans, because Cleopatra was passing by in
her
litter, that he had bestowed upon his paramour th
oman politicians, a firm disinclination to join in quarrels fought at
her
expense. Why should Italy sacrifice brave sons an
a degenerate Roman to install a barbarian queen upon the Capitol with
her
eunuchs, her mosquito-nets and all the apparatus
Roman to install a barbarian queen upon the Capitol with her eunuchs,
her
mosquito-nets and all the apparatus of oriental l
grown rich from the revenues of the East, the return she gained from
her
export of soldiers, financiers and governors. The
o became King of Mauretania. Such was the fate of Egypt’s Queen and
her
children, crowned kings and queens. The Roman imp
re superbos. 1 But the armies of Rome presented a greater danger to
her
stability than did any foreign enemy. After Actiu
0 B.C. It would be exceedingly rash to speculate on the identity of
her
husband Gallus: but a knight as powerful as C. Co
rs of Illyricum and Macedonia were satisfactory; and Africa nourished
her
proverbial wars. Special commands were no novel
in Rome of their own right, the Claudii and the Livii. She exploited
her
skill for the advantage of herself and her family
d the Livii. She exploited her skill for the advantage of herself and
her
family. Augustus never failed to take her advice
he advantage of herself and her family. Augustus never failed to take
her
advice on matters of state. It was worth having,
secret. Livia had not given the Princeps a child. She had two sons by
her
first husband, Ti. Claudius Nero and Nero Claudiu
ii, the Nerones. There was closer kin. Octavia had been employed in
her
brother’s interest before and knew no policy but
s made a fatal mistake he told Terentia of the danger that threatened
her
brother. 3 Augustus could not forgive a breach of
confidence. Maecenas’ wife was beautiful and temperamental. Life with
her
was not easy. 4 An added complication was Augustu
tch had been contrived long ago by Livia, that astute politician whom
her
great-grandson called ‘the Roman Ulysses’. 1 For
politician whom her great-grandson called ‘the Roman Ulysses’. 1 For
her
son she might have selected an heiress from the m
Livia Drusilla held the office of a municipal magistrate at Fundi, so
her
irreverent great-grandson alleged. 1 The Empire
rebuke of the princess his paramour for the disgrace she brought upon
her
family, her ancestors and all posterity by succum
e princess his paramour for the disgrace she brought upon her family,
her
ancestors and all posterity by succumbing to the
gt;358 1 Suetonius, Cal. 23, 2 (Aufidius Lurco or rather, Alfidius:
her
mother was called Alfidia, ILS 125). 2 Tacitus,
time the capital city was relieved of the burdensome presence of both
her
rulers. There followed a certain relaxation in th
r was not the Princeps’ only pawn. His sister Octavia had children by
her
two marriages: from the first, C. Marcellus and t
ere each twice married. Hence another Octavia, Augustus’ half-sister:
her
sons were Sex. Appuleius and M. Appuleius, both c
fter the death of his wife Cornelia in 16 B.C. He died soon after and
her
second husband Barbatus died in his consulate.
ghter, the beautiful Lollia Paullina, paraded like a princess. It was
her
habit to appear, not merely at state banquets, bu
rely at state banquets, but on less exacting occasions, draped in all
her
pearls, and little else: her attire was valued at
n less exacting occasions, draped in all her pearls, and little else:
her
attire was valued at a mere forty million sesterc
oman matrons, herself the model and paragon, or weaving garments with
her
own hands, destined to clothe her husband, the Ro
d paragon, or weaving garments with her own hands, destined to clothe
her
husband, the Roman magistrate. Her private activi
vius Otho, the consulate for M. Plautius Silvanus, who was the son of
her
intimate friend Urgulania. 4 NotesPage=>385
itus, Ann. 2, 34; 4, 21 f. It may also be surmised in the marriage of
her
granddaughter to Claudius the son of Drusus (Suet
atrician Ser. Sulpicius Galba were handsomely rewarded by legacies in
her
will. 1 Much worse than that was suspected and ru
s suspected and rumoured about Livia poison and murder. Her power and
her
following can be detected in the time of her son,
nd murder. Her power and her following can be detected in the time of
her
son, most distasteful to him. Antonius’ daughter,
t of Pompeius, Livia would have been a political force, comparable to
her
kinswoman Servilia. When Augustus took counsel wi
t relationship. Yet even had Livia not been the wife of the Princeps,
her
son under the revived aristocracy of the New Stat
e in low water: Tiberius lived on in exile and might never return. On
her
own side of the family she lacked relatives who m
atives who might be built up into a faction. 2 To be sure, there were
her
grandchildren, the three children of Drusus and A
4, 1), was a distant relative. Likewise Livia Medullina, who died on
her
wedding day (Suetonius, Divus Claudius 26, 1). Cf
f Rome now had their turn for nine years. Livia waited and worked for
her
family, patient and unobtrusive. There must be no
rd in the syndicate of government. In the end, everything played into
her
hands. In 2 B.C. an opportune scandal burst into
t it was not of Livia’s doing, and it brought no immediate benefit to
her
son. The whole episode is mysterious. NotesPage
sland. He provided the Senate with a document and full particulars of
her
misbehaviour, her paramours and her accomplices:
the Senate with a document and full particulars of her misbehaviour,
her
paramours and her accomplices: they were said to
document and full particulars of her misbehaviour, her paramours and
her
accomplices: they were said to be numerous, of ev
stantial reports of the revels of Julia, of the number and variety of
her
lovers, were propagated by rumour, embellished wi
cturnal debauch the Forum and the very Rostra from which the Princeps
her
father had promulgated the laws that were to sanc
Rome. 7 It may be tempting, but it is not necessary, to rehabilitate
her
entirely. Julia may have been immodest, but she w
adultery Julia was a Roman aristocrat and claimed the prerogatives of
her
station and family8 was it necessary that there s
ight have been suspected, bearing heavily on the Julii who supplanted
her
son. But no ancient testimony makes this easy gue
the erring mother did not impair the succession of Gaius and Lucius,
her
sons. The motive must have been political, the
Julia may well have found the accomplished Antonius more amiable than
her
grim husband. But all is uncertain if Augustus st
scandal and conspiracy, merciless towards Julia and the five nobiles
her
allies; and in A.D.I, when his son and heir was c
Then Germany rose. Varus and three legions perished. Rome did not see
her
new master for many years. The adoption of Tibe
People. Julia, it was alleged, had slipped into the wayward habits of
her
gay and careless mother. She was therefore relega
e accused of adultery with Julia, for she was his wife. Connivance in
her
misconduct may have been invoked to palliate his
he scholiast on Juvenal 6, 158, states that Julia was relegated after
her
husband had been put to death, then recalled, but
th, then recalled, but finally exiled when she proved incorrigible in
her
vices. If this could be taken as quite reliable,
The Roman matron could claim that she needed no written law to guide
her
, no judge to correct: mi natura dedit leges a s
ion of the State a measure quite superfluous so long as Rome remained
her
ancient self. In the aristocracy of the last age
husband, after divorcing, could prosecute both the guilty partner and
her
paramour. The penalty was severe relegation to th
r all time in war. In the exaltation of ‘Itala virtus’ Rome magnified
her
valour, for Rome had prevailed over Italy. Page
ld no longer disguise, the decline of Italy and the transformation of
her
governing class, the rule of wealth was convenien
Aeneas a foreshadowing of Augustus. Like the transference of Troy and
her
gods to Italy, the building of the New Rome was a
harmlessness would divert attention from the real offences of Julia,
her
husband and her ostensible paramours, and create
uld divert attention from the real offences of Julia, her husband and
her
ostensible paramours, and create the impression t
with the gods and honoured the land. Earth requited with the gift of
her
fruits ‘iustissima tellus’. The figure of Terra M
rganized a procession of society ladies in protest against Quirinius,
her
former husband. The spectators responded loyally,
r resources and tightened their alliances. Thus did Servilia work for
her
family, capturing the Aemilian connexion. But all
Cassius’ wife, was the last. She died at the age of ninety-three. At
her
funeral were borne the imagines of twenty noble h
three. At her funeral were borne the imagines of twenty noble houses,
her
ancestors and her kin. 2 Yet Cassius’ stock, with
ral were borne the imagines of twenty noble houses, her ancestors and
her
kin. 2 Yet Cassius’ stock, with eminent consuls,
rank and leaving no heir; 4 his spirited sister chose to perish with
her
husband, young Lepidus. Scaurus was spared after
ce to the later generations of the Julii and Claudii. Livia had given
her
husband no children but the Claudii ruled. And in
13, 1). Junia Calvina was relegated on a charge of incest with one of
her
brothers (Ann. 12, 4); for the date of her death,
arge of incest with one of her brothers (Ann. 12, 4); for the date of
her
death, cf. Suetonius, Divus Vesp. 23, 4. PageBo
ius Ahenobarbus, 378, 421. Antonia (Minor), married to Drusus, 378;
her
court, 386; her three children, 422. Antonii, 19,
378, 421. Antonia (Minor), married to Drusus, 378; her court, 386;
her
three children, 422. Antonii, 19, 493, 494, 495.
relations with Caesar, 275; donations by Antonius, 260, 270, 300 f.;
her
rapacity, 260, 270; relations with Antonius and t
elative unimportance, 274; end of Cleopatra, 298 f.; the legend, 299;
her
children, 261, 270, 300. Cleopatra Selene, 261,
ghter of Sulla, 25, 279. Cornelia, daughter of Scribonia, 229, 238;
her
sons, 422; exemplar of female virtue, 444, 467.
the proscriptions, 191; in the Perusine War, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212;
her
flight and death, 215, 217; her children, 189, 29
erusine War, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212; her flight and death, 215, 217;
her
children, 189, 299; a rehabilitation, 208. Fulv
man’s son in militia equestris, 354. Junia, wife of Cassius, 69, 116;
her
funeral, 492. Junia, mother of C. Claudius Marc
rnment writers, 488. See also History, Roman Poets. Livia Drusilla,
her
marriage to Octavianus, 229; character and ambiti
her marriage to Octavianus, 229; character and ambitions of, 340 f.;
her
success in 23 B.C., 345; political activities of,
racter, 422, 425. Lollia, wife of A. Gabinius, 31. Lollia Paullina,
her
pearls, 381, 477; husbands, 499, 518. Lollii, 3
, marries a woman from Asculum, 357. Mantua, 465. Marcella (Major),
her
husbands, 378, 379; her daughter Claudia Pulchra,
sculum, 357. Mantua, 465. Marcella (Major), her husbands, 378, 379;
her
daughter Claudia Pulchra, 421. Marcella (Minor),
bands, 378, 379; her daughter Claudia Pulchra, 421. Marcella (Minor),
her
marriages, 378, 421, 422. Marcellus, see Claudi
nt back by Antonius, 226; behaviour in 35 B.C., 265; divorce of, 280;
her
son Marcellus, 341. Octavia, half-sister of Aug
., partisan of Sex. Pompeius, 228, 232. Plotina, wife of Trajan, 415;
her
origin, 502. Plotius Plancus, L., proscribed, 1
cipio, see Cornelius. Scribonia, wife of Octavianus, 213, 219, 229;
her
other husbands, 229. Scribonia, wife of Sex. Po
29; her other husbands, 229. Scribonia, wife of Sex. Pompeius, 213;
her
descendants, 425, 496 f. Scribonia, wife of M. Li
), 23, 45. Servilia, the mother of Brutus, 12, 21, 23 f., 136, 185;
her
ambition and influence, 23 f., 69; liaison with C
; her ambition and influence, 23 f., 69; liaison with Caesar, 35, 58;
her
hatred of Pompeius, 58, 69; as amatchmaker, 58, 6
cus, betrothed to Octavianus, 182, 189; married to Lepidus’ son, 230;
her
death, 298. Servilii, 18 f., 21, 23, 69, 84, 42
n the Bellum Italicum, 87; men from Umbria, 90, 360 f., 466. Urbinia,
her
heirs defended by Pollio, 193. Urbinius Panapio
to Claudius, 422. Urvinum, 353. Valeria Messallina, 499, 500, 504;
her
lineage, 496. Valerii, 10, 18, 84, 85, 163, 238