he various political leaders enter into their own at last. The method
has
to be selective: exhaustive detail cannot be prov
is said about Cicero and about Livy. Yet, in the end, the Principate
has
to be accepted, for the Principate, while abolish
sely in their fashion (chapter xxxiii, Pax et Princeps). The design
has
imposed a pessimistic and truculent tone, to the
from the ‘traditional’ and conventional view of the period. Much that
has
recently been written about Augustus is simply pa
him raise his eyebrows. Its imperfections are patent and flagrant. It
has
not been composed in tranquillity; and it ought t
an political terminology and of the realities of Roman political life
has
sometimes induced historians to fancy that the Pr
land into a nation, with a stable and enduring government. The tale
has
often been told, with an inevitability of events
n. To one of the unsuccessful champions of political liberty sympathy
has
seldom been denied. Cicero was a humane and culti
me time professed his attachment to NotesPage=>005 1 As Pollio
has
perished, Tacitus and Sallust can be drawn upon f
3 His master had less exacting standards. The great work of Pollio
has
perished, save for inconsiderable fragments or su
and its sequel, the Principate of Caesar Augustus, in a fashion that
has
now become unconventional, NotesPage=>006
ce in the towns of Italy, the proportion was clearly much higher than
has
sometimes been imagined. Of a total of six Note
, influenced by the subsequent actions of the proconsul and Dictator,
has
produced a conventional, anachronistic and highly
in a harmony so swift and sure as to appear pre-ordained; and history
has
sometimes been written as though Caesar set the t
1 His judgement was vindicated in blood and suffering; and posterity
has
seen fit to condemn the act of the Liberators, fo
contemporaries and often believed by posterity to be a revolutionary
has
led to undue emphasis on the non-senatorial or ev
is trait and policy of Caesar was patent to contemporaries. 3 Justice
has
not always been done to the generous and liberal
2; 9, 10, 2 and 6; 11, 6, 2. 4 Dessau (Hermes XLVI (1911), 613 FF.)
has
rendered it highly probable that the Caesarian Cu
so BG 7, 65, 2. 2 Ad fam. 10, 32, 5, where it is stated that Gallus
has
in his possession a dramatic poem written by the
career was laborious, but his origin may have been reputable. History
has
record of a family of Ventidii, municipal magistr
are hostile to Pompeius and the legitimate government of Rome. Caesar
has
a mixed following, some stripped from Pompeius, o
es not definitely incriminate him. By October, however, the situation
has
changed, the story has gained colour and strength
minate him. By October, however, the situation has changed, the story
has
gained colour and strength (Phil. 2, 91). Even if
the national front and the uniting of Italy. The memory of Antonius
has
suffered damage multiple and irreparable. The pol
, 3; echoes in Cicero, Phil. 2. 113; 10, 8. PageBook=>120 July
has
already been narrated. He might invoke the tribun
prime importance when he arrived in Italy. Seven months pass, and he
has
money, troops and a following. Whence came his ad
own, to loyal Caesarian adherents, to shady adventurers. Good fortune
has
preserved the names of three of his earliest asso
was the millionaire Balbus. Balbus could keep his counsel,4 and time
has
respected his secrets. No record survives of his
scanty. For sufficient reasons. History, intent to blacken his rival,
has
preserved instead the public invectives which des
he sombre Brutus was later to recall with bitter rebuke. 1 Octavianus
has
sometimes been condemned for cold and brutal trea
ook=>156 It is the excuse of the revolutionary that the Republic
has
succumbed to tyranny or to anarchy, it is his ide
n matron. 1 The identification of the child of destiny is a task that
has
exercised the ingenuity and revealed the credulit
beyond question. Whether the discarded Scribonia took another husband
has
not been recorded. 7 NotesPage=>229 1 Suet
How desperate had been his plight at the time of the War of Perusia
has
already been described. He was saved in war and d
t of Brundisium to his triumph in the Sicilian War, and the new party
has
acquired distinction as well as solidity. The pro
g Republicans and Antonians (the two terms were sometimes synonymous)
has
already advanced a stage; and his following alrea
aigns of 35 and 34 B.C. His was the glory. NotesPage=>240 1 It
has
sometimes been argued that Octavianus in these ye
ce, and who held Macedonia with the command of Antonius’ Balkan army,
has
not been recorded. From their base in Armenia t
3 As in the matter of the conference at Tarentum, the role of Octavia
has
probably been embellished. Compare the judicious
n the three children whom Cleopatra had borne him. Hostile propaganda
has
so far magnified and distorted these celebrations
(Charisius, GL 104, 18; 129, 7; 146, 34). 6 The whole topic, which
has
provoked excessive debate, does not need to be di
capital to Alexandria. 4 Her favourite oath, it was even stated (and
has
since been believed), was ‘so may I deliver my ed
cure. Months passed, with operations by land and sea of which history
has
preserved no adequate record. Antonius’ admiral S
ot allowed to celebrate his triumph till July, 27 B.C. When a party
has
triumphed in civil war, it claims to have asserte
tock, destined himself for divinity, but not before his rule on earth
has
restored confidence between men and respect for t
supreme power—‘per consensum universorum potitus rerum omnium. ’1 It
has
often been believed that the words allude to the
ould be likely to survive, when an important public event of the year
has
barely been preserved, let alone understood in fu
been variously, sometimes extravagantly, estimated: Cicero’s Republic
has
even been regarded as a tract for the times, reco
s auctor’. 2 He called it the Optimus status’ himself: the writer who
has
transmitted these unexceptionable observations go
l title by which he chose to be designated was ‘princeps’. Auctoritas
has
a venerable and imposing sound: unfriendly critic
eigned moderation and stealthy aggrandizement after the Civil Wars he
has
not deigned to allude to this transaction at all.
ernment, the identity of the agents and ministers of power. That task
has
all too often been ignored or evaded. Augustus
on a single person, only the detachment commanded by Augustus himself
has
left any record. The campaign was grim and arduou
, 25f. PageBook=>336 The anxiety was public and widespread: it
has
found vivid and enduring expression in the prefac
ble, it was rumoured, to those notorious charms which the poet Horace
has
so candidly depicted. 5 Maecenas might be dropp
rippae ablegatio. ’ It is evident that Tiberius’ retirement to Rhodes
has
coloured earlier history. PageBook=>343 So
LS 913) may illustrate the names ending in ‘-idius’. 3 ILS 5925. He
has
two gentilicia. Each of them is found at Canusium
ar. 2 What name the enemies of the government found for his behaviour
has
escaped record. One of them was removed by violen
as against nine nobiles. 2 After seizing power in 32 B.C. Octavianus
has
sole control of patronage, advancing his own part
323; 409; 457; also 878 (Aquileia). The burial-place of the Statilii
has
yielded over four hundred inscriptions of slaves
house. A court soon develops, with forms and hierarchies. The ruler
has
his intimates, amici and comites, so designated b
s and Drusus in converging and triumphant campaigns (15 B.C.). Silius
has
almost faded from historical record: the two Clau
reign policy of Augustus, see CAH x, 355 ff.: the truth of the matter
has
often been obscured by the belief that Octavianus
leius, perhaps also ignorance about the condition of Dio’s narrative,
has
perpetuated wholly unsatisfactory beliefs about t
tica was severed from Hispania Ulterior and transferred to the Senate
has
not been recorded. Hardly perhaps as late as 2 B.
record of the wars of Augustus is fragmentary and capricious. Design
has
conspired with accident, for the Princeps intende
the scenes of all public transactions. The era of cabinet government
has
set in. The Senate was no longer a sovran body, b
f wealthy knights, whether as individuals or as corporations all this
has
sufficiently been demonstrated. The domination of
to dwell in the East in a private station. However it be (and scandal
has
probably embellished the topic in the interests o
Arruntius. That is not the only uncertainty here. The MS. of Tacitus
has
‘M. Lepidum’. Lipsius altered to ‘M’. Lepidum’, w
empire without the virtues that had won it? 4 A well-ordered state
has
no need of great men, and no room for them. The l
receive no praise from the poets. 1 Pompeius was no better, though he
has
the advantage over Caesar in Virgil’s solemn exho
overnment. There is much more authentic religious sentiment here than
has
sometimes been believed. 4 It will suffice to obs
tes. 455 1 Suetonius, Divus Aug. 90 ff. His protecting deity Apollo
has
indigenous features. Vediovis, worshipped by the
ast generation was not rich in models to commend or imitate. Horace
has
never a word to say of Catullus and Lucretius. Th
nt past to be omitted Aeneas appears in the act of sacrifice after he
has
seen the portent that promises to his family an a
to be suspicious. Though the murderous tyranny of the Julio-Claudians
has
all but exhausted the Republican and the Augustan
behaved like courtiers and flatterers of an oriental monarch. History
has
preserved a characteristic remark of this Republi
Under Augustus the stage for the grim tragedy of the Julio- Claudians
has
already been set, the action has begun. Like Sall
grim tragedy of the Julio- Claudians has already been set, the action
has
begun. Like Sallustius and Pollio, the senator Ta
4, 32. Ch. XXXIII PAX ET PRINCEPS PageBook=>509 WHEN a party
has
triumphed in violence and seized control of the S
ry precisely the clients of the Princeps (Klio XXII (1928), 261 ff.),
has
not always been sufficiently regarded. PageBook