l of Republican institutions, the assumption of a specious title, the
change
in the definition of authority, all that made no
als capture attention and engross history, but the most revolutionary
changes
in Roman politics were the work of families or of
ation of the Roman State, the manner and fashion of dynastic politics
changes
but little; and though noble houses suffered defe
h: a Sullan partisan before turning popularis, Pompeius by his latest
change
of front came back to earlier alliances. Sulla
as his power subsisted. Enemies and rivals were waiting to exploit a
change
. In Egypt Caesar could support a candidate, Cleop
ed by orators or by political theorists: the slow process of peaceful
change
, the gradual adoption of the Latin tongue and Rom
mph of a military leader, reviving the party of Marius, might promise
change
. 2 Cicero claimed that in the space of thirty yea
ntic and contemporary testimony, a perpetual hazard in estimating the
change
and development between youth and middle age. T
d the need for courage and constancy in all the paths of duplicity. A
change
of front in politics is not disastrous unless cau
d to the following of Isauricus. 3 Piso and P. Servilius each had a
change
of side to their credit. No politician could comp
ive people, devoted to the worship of law and order. The advocates of
change
therefore appealed, not to reform or progress, no
ersonal allegiance. For profit or for safety it might be necessary to
change
sides. Suitable terminology was available. The di
was then proclaimed. It existed already. For the moment, however, no
change
in the military situation in the north. The easte
inary command over all the provinces of the East. The revolutionary
change
in the East alarmed the friends of Antonius: ther
in of the most powerful of the Caesarian generals. Hence an immediate
change
of front NotesPage=>187 1 Velleius 2, 69,
ctims as well, men of substance and repute from the towns of Italy.
Change
and casualties are most clearly evident among the
lican or neutral. 2 For the present, however, no indication of such a
change
. Octavianus went to Gaul for a brief visit, Lep
not attested with Octavianus before 36 B.C. The reason given for his
change
of allegiance was naturally disapproval of Antoni
d Roman, might be prized and preserved until threatened by a complete
change
of taste, by a reversion to Asianism, or by the r
he manner and fashion of the new. On the surface, consolidation after
change
and disturbance: beneath, no confidence yet or un
us in 35 (Dio 49, 17, 5; Appian, BC 5, 137, 567 ff.). 6 On Dellius’
changes
of side, Seneca, Suasoriae 1, 7; Velleius, 2, 84,
e the time when the entry into office of new consuls last portended a
change
in politics a whole age seemed to have elapsed, a
t the enemies of the State (hostes); and as such the oath could never
change
or lapse. By whatever name known or public title
. Romans too departed, M. Junius Silanus and the agile Dellius, whose
changes
of side were proverbial but not unparalleled. 1 T
n his sixth and seventh consulates carried out certain constitutional
changes
, various in kind and variously to be interpreted.
ation for authority, precedent and tradition, by a rooted distaste of
change
unless change could be shown to be in harmony wit
ority, precedent and tradition, by a rooted distaste of change unless
change
could be shown to be in harmony with ancestral cu
had an evil ring. Yet the memory of the past reminded the Romans that
change
had come, though slow and combated. Rome’s pecu
) multum, quod putarem novandum in legibus ‘(ib. 3, 12). In fact, the
changes
he proposes are few and modest, little more than
een stabilized. Neither the Princeps nor any of his adherents desired
change
and disturbance. Well might he say, when asked hi
ni viri’ could ever produce an exemplary kind of citizen. Names might
change
: Augustus was none the less a revolutionary leade
ark an era in dating; in the provinces it passed almost unnoticed. No
change
in the foreign or domestic policy of the governme
ight later be modified how and when he pleased. One thing could never
change
, the source and origin of his domination. When
νεωτερίσαι δυνάμενα κατέσχεν. PageBook=>327 the only immediate
change
from Triumviral practice. No longer the menace of
ire might suitably be reckoned from this year. The legal and formal
changes
have been summarily described, the arguments indi
, from the centurionate to equestrian posts. The Revolution brought a
change
, deriving perhaps from purely military needs as w
ous Republic of the nobiles. No mere stabilizing here, but a constant
change
and renewing. Liberal theory and the long-desir
the more important. On neither occasion is evidence recorded of vital
changes
concerning the magistracies: it is therefore hard
ted from control and restored to Republican freedom. That there was
change
and development is clear. The minor magistracies
toration of the nobiles, the proportion on the Fasti showing no great
change
from the Triumviral period. After 19 B.C., howe
at hand, with long periods of residence in the provinces. Now comes a
change
in part the result of accident. Augustus himsel
oscribed and defeated Republicans, the provincia of Augustus began to
change
into a permanent order of praetorian and consular
ons. The contrast with the three provinces of 27 B.C. illustrates the
change
both in administration and in foreign policy. A
EM magistratuum vocabula. ’1 Names persist everywhere while substance
changes
. Like the individual senator, the Senate as a bod
other board of magistrates and fifteen senators chosen by lot, was to
change
every six months. 1 It appears to have persisted
upon the functions of the full Senate. 2 But this was not a permanent
change
; and the committee seems subsequently to have lap
the Lex Julia de adulteriis, both of this year; there were subsequent
changes
and additions, the most important being the Lex P
an morality, was forced to express his doubts to the Senate. 1 That a
change
later came over the Roman aristocracy was evident
t;476 THE army had made one emperor and could make another; and the
change
from Republic to Empire might be described as the
quent Rabirius who had written about the War of Actium. 1 Governments
change
and careerists make mistakes. Seianus fell. The h
fated to return again when a state had run through the whole cycle of
change
. The Roman, with his native theory of unrestric
or from honest independence like Piso. With the Principate comes a
change
. For the senator, as for the State, there must su
f., 352, 365, 510 f., 521; prejudice in, 11, 78, 81, 354, 357; social
change
, 78 f., 243, 255 f., 351 ff., 455 f., 501 ff. S
Sullan, 88, 89; Caesarian, 101, 120, 255; bribed by Octavianus, 125;
changes
of side, 159; pacifism of, 180 f.; Roman compared