n politics here expounded owes to the supreme example and guidance of Münzer : but for his work on Republican family-history, t

il my principal debts are to the numerous prosopographical studies of Münzer , Groag and Stein. Especial mention must also be m

t prominence. The Servilii, old allies of the NotesPage=>018 1 Münzer , RA, 53 ff. 2 No Fabius was consul between 116

6 NotesPage=>019 1 That of Q. Servilius Caepio, cos. 106; cf. Münzer , RA, 285 ff. 2 Cf. Münzer, RA 305 ff. The patri

hat of Q. Servilius Caepio, cos. 106; cf. Münzer, RA, 285 ff. 2 Cf. Münzer , RA 305 ff. The patriciate was in very low water

143) had four consular sons. For the stemma, see Table I at end. 4 Münzer , RA, 302 ff.; J. Carcopino, Sylla ou la monarchie

of Balearicus, and Ap. Pulcher’s wife was his daughter. The table in Münzer , RA, 304, shows these relationships clearly. Cf.

o commanded NotesPage=>021 1 See, above all, the researches of Münzer , RA, 328 ff. For the stemma, see Table II at end.

lus (cos. 78) was married to Q. Hortensius (cos. 69). For the stemma, Münzer , RA, 224; for connexions of Catulus with the Domi

maternam obtinebat auctoritatem. ’ About this woman, cf., above all, Münzer , RA, 336 ff. PageBook=>024 prime. 1 But Se

ii Cottae. For the stemma, showing also a connexion with the Rutilii, Münzer , RA, 327. Caesar also had in him the blood of the

ς νϵĸα ĸαὶ | [ϵὐ]νoίας ϵἰς αυτóν. 3 Manilius, Aztron. 1, 793 f. 4 Münzer , RA, 248 f. Described as ‘humili atque obscuro lo

ard NotesPage=>033 1 Plutarch, Pompeius 44; Cato minor 30. Cf. Münzer , RA, 349 ff. 2 That it need not have been a ser

aepio (Suetonius, Divus Iulius 21; Plutarch, Caesar 14; Pompeius 47). Münzer (RA, 338 f.) argues that this is no other than Br

(Cicero, Phil. 10, 25, &c). For a discussion of other views, cf. Münzer in P-W 11 A, 1775 ff. PageBook=>035 Cato h

pio in Africa (Bell. Afr. 46, 3). 2 For a reasoned judgement, cf. Münzer , P-W II A, 870 3 Frontinus, De aq. 76 4 And w

tumii, with Ser. Sulpicius Rufus and C. Claudius C. f. Marcellus, see Münzer , RA, 407; P- W, Supp. v, 369 ff. 3 L. Julius Ca

(the worship of Vediovis at Bovillae by the ‘genteiles Iuliei’). 5 Münzer , RA, 356; 358 f.; 424. PageBook=>069 not i

icians were the consular Messalla Rufus and Ser. Sulpicius Galba. 3 Münzer , RA, 12 ff. 4 Ib. 347 ff. Her second husband wa

identification with the muleteer Sabinus in Virgil, Catalept. 10, cf. Münzer in P-W I A, 1592 ff. It is not really very plausi

5 Suetonius, Divus Iulius 76, 3. Possibly ‘Rufio’, not ‘Rufinus’, cf. Münzer in P-W IA, 1198. 6 At least seventy millions (D

erna, can be distinguished, of whom the first at least was a senator ( Münzer , P-W VII, 2512 ff.). If the scholiast Porphyrio (

, 3). Another senator from Spain may be Titius, Bell. Afr. 28, 2, cf. Münzer , P- W VI A, 1557. For the possibility that there

1 ff. The Fabii seem to have acquired great influence in Etruria, cf. Münzer , RA, 55 f. 6 Münzer, RA, 56 ff. He argues that

o have acquired great influence in Etruria, cf. Münzer, RA, 55 f. 6 Münzer , RA, 56 ff. He argues that the Atilii came from C

deserted and became consul at Rome in the same year). On the Plautii, Münzer , RA, 44. 2 W. Schur, Hermes LIX (1924), 450 ff.

n hardly be accepted as historical, cf. now P-W, Supp. v, 356 ff. 5 Münzer , RA, 191 ff. 6 Id., P-W XII, 401. 7 Ib. XIX,

ator. 3 ILS 8888. Cf. above, p. 28, n. 1. 4 Above, p. 31. 5 Cf. Münzer , P-W III, 1267, invoking the inscrr. CIL XIV, 262

m of ‘Petrucidius’ or ‘Petrusidius’, ILS 6132b, cf. Schulze, LE, 170; Münzer , P-W XIX, 1304 f. Note also the names of the cent

ter Pharsalus Suetonius, Divus Iulius 30, 4. 4 W. Schulze, LE, 530; Münzer , P-W III, 1612. C. Carrinas, the son of the Maria

ll as after, borne by NotesPage=>093 1 W. Schulze, LE, passim; Münzer , RA, 46 ff. (‘Die Einbürgerung fremder Her renges

7th, ably argued by O. E. Schmidt, accepted by many and reinforced by Münzer (P- W, Supp. v, 375 f.), is certainly attractive.

t. 14, 9, 3), L. Staius Murcus being sent out as proconsul in 44, cf. Münzer , P-W III A, 2137. Crispus, proconsul of Bithynia

fuerit’ (ib. 2, 3). For a tessera of his grandfather the banker, see Münzer , Hermes LXXI (1936), 222 ff. 2 As Velleius happ

he Dictator. Possibly true of Pinarius, most unlikely for Pedius, cf. Münzer , Hermes LXXI (1936), 226 ff.; P-W XIX, 38 ff. Q.

pi and probably the same person as the Antonian Pinarius Scarpus, cf. Münzer , Hermes LXXI (1936), 229. Of Another Relative Of

rectly transmitted we might have here not Maecenas but his father (so Münzer , P-W xiv, 206). About the last three names few at

. Sulpicius Rufus (cos. 51 B.C.). For a table of these relationships, Münzer , RA, 407. Ch. X THE SENIOR STATESMAN PageBook

r 37; Dio 41, 16, 4; Cicero, Ad Att. 7, 13, 1; Ad fam. 14, 14, 2. 2 Münzer , RA, 355 ff.; P-W 11 A, 1798 ff. 3 Suetonius, D

Phil, 10, 13; ILS 9460 (Delos). On the relationship with Brutus, cf. Münzer , RA, 342 ff. 4 M. Appuleius (Phil. 10, 24), pro

indicating Etruscan origin or influence, cf. W. Schulze, LE, 531 ff. Münzer , however, argues that he came from the ancient co

view of Fulvia, the last survivor of a great political family, cf. Münzer , P-W VII, 283 f.) Further, L. Antonius has been i

arried Servilia, the daughter of P. Servilius (Velleius 2, 88, 4, cf. Münzer , RA, 370). Perhaps in 36 B.C.: pretty certainly t

B.C.), also a new name. 8 NotesPage=>235 1 CIL 12, p. 42. 2 Münzer , P-W XIX, 45 ff. 3 Ad fam. 10, 33, 4. 4 Appia

XIX, 45 ff. 3 Ad fam. 10, 33, 4. 4 Appian, BC 5, 54, 229 f., cf. Münzer , P-W XIX, 46 f. and 51. This man was present, alo

of media, oppius statianus (plutarch, Antonius 38). On the Oppii, cf. Münzer , P-W XVIII, 726 ff. (forthcoming). On Sosius and

743. 4 On Poplicola, the son of the Pompeian consul of 72 B.C., cf. Münzer , P-W VII, 103 ff.: he is the Gellius infamously d

proconsul of Macedonia. For the activity of Plautii in the East, cf. Münzer , RA, 43 f. On that family, cf. also below, p. 422

Plautii, one of the earliest houses of the new plebeian nobility, see Münzer , RA, 36ff. One of them was colleague with Ap. Cla

e with Ap. Claudius Caecus in his famous censorship. It is assumed by Münzer that M. Plautius Silvanus (cos. 2 B.C.) and A. Pl

was exiled by Nero (Ann. 16, 7 ff.). 4 Seneca, Epp. 55, 2 ff., cf. Münzer , RA, 374 f. He is described as ‘ille praetorius d

the Caecilii Metelli has been compiled with the help of the tables of Münzer (P-W III, 1229 f.; RA, 304). Certain additions ha

. II. THE KINSMEN OF CATO This table reproduces the researches of Münzer , RA, 328 ff. The leading clue is provided by the

(tr. pl. 91 B.C.). For the relationship of Catulus to the Domitii cf. Münzer , RA, 286 f.; on Q. Servilius Caepio, who adopted