eparate kingdoms or else a renegade, coming like a monarch out of the
East
, would subjugate Rome to an alien rule. Italy suf
e was married to a Servilia (Ad Alt. 12, 20, 2). 4 He served in the
East
on the staffs of Lucullus (Plutarch, Lucullus 34)
h corn or money. 4 Against the military dynast now returning from the
East
he would oppose that alliance of stubborn spirit
bsent dynast overshadowed the politics of Rome, sending home from the
East
, as before from Spain, his lieutenants to stand f
nly been misunderstood. PageBook=>030 and resources of all the
East
at his back, he disbanded his army. Much to his a
or marched along the great roads of Asia, dispersing the kings of the
East
, displaying power and founding cities in his name
served as a legate with Pompeius both in the Sertorian War and in the
East
, on sea and on land, cf. C. Cichorius, R. Studien
: a decree of the People was enacted, permitting the conqueror of the
East
to wear the robe of a triumphator or a golden cro
ose, saying nothing. 3 No happier in the Senate, the conqueror of the
East
neglected to praise the saviour of Italy, and the
t and vindictive, to contest the dispositions made by Pompeius in the
East
. Pompeius requested their acceptance by the Senat
enerals or of demagogues well enough. When Pompeius returned from the
East
, he lacked the desire as well as the pretext to m
ls and rivalry, Pompeius broke the alliance when he returned from the
East
; and the consul Metellus Celer banded with the Ca
Certain of the Lentuli had served under Pompeius in Spain and in the
East
:2 five consulates in this generation rewarded the
attacked a proconsul who was fighting the wars of the Republic in the
East
. Sulla had all the ambition of a Roman noble: but
aesar entrapped between the legions of Spain and the hosts of all the
East
, and then to return, like Sulla, to victory and t
t and hereditary succession; as though Pompeius, the conqueror of the
East
and of every continent, did not exploit for his o
ng of 44 B.C. for several years of campaigning in the Balkans and the
East
, he tied up magistracies and provincial commands
turn now. The extended commands of Pompeius in the West and in the
East
furnished scope for political patronage as well a
om Pompeius, the tribes of the Balkans, the kings and horsemen of the
East
. 1 Pompeius derided Lucullus, naming him ‘the Rom
Gaetuli had forgotten Marius and the war against Jugurtha. 1 In the
East
kings, dynasts and cities stood loyal to Pompeius
W VII, 1817 ff. They were a noted commercial family, trading with the
East
(for Granii at Delos see BCH XXXI (1907), 443 f;
d damage multiple and irreparable. The policy which he adopted in the
East
and his association with the Queen of Egypt were
But that province was soon to be stripped of its legions. As for the
East
, Trebonius and Cimber might have Asia and Bithyni
Dolabella, without awaiting the end of his consulate, set out for the
East
to secure the province of Syria. Antonius had a
s of the Dictator and of the annual tribute from the provinces of the
East
. 2 It is alleged that he duly dispatched these mo
to one of the generals of the Republic. When Pompeius had subdued the
East
to the arms of Rome, he received an alarming prop
e to Syria, the other to secure for him the legions in Egypt. Yet the
East
was not altogether barren of hope for the Republi
r, however, while delaying news, would facilitate a revolution in the
East
. The friends and relatives of Brutus and Cassius
was as yet no authentic news of his successes: his usurpation in the
East
and seizure of a dozen legions was not confirmed
olabella, with an extraordinary command over all the provinces of the
East
. The revolutionary change in the East alarmed t
over all the provinces of the East. The revolutionary change in the
East
alarmed the friends of Antonius: there was little
ry to the credit of the patriotic armies and all the provinces of the
East
in the hands of Brutus and Cassius, the Republic
might be caught between Caesarians in the West and Republicans in the
East
, crushed and exterminated. If Brutus and Cassius
r’s heir. 4 And now on others beside Octavianus the menace from the
East
loomed heavily. The Republicans in the Senate s
F. Blumenthal, Wiener Studien xxxv (1913), 269. PageBook=>164
East
were consigned to Cassius in one act. Nor was thi
as not with the plan already conceived of mustering the armies of the
East
, invading Italy and restoring the Republic throug
h Cassius. To cross to Italy without Cassius and the resources of the
East
would have been a fatal step. The Caesarian gener
the city of Rome and the gathering power of Brutus and Cassius in the
East
, the Caesarian leaders were drawn irresistibly to
proscribed got safely away and took refuge with the Liberators in the
East
or with Sex. Pompeius on the western seas and in
fighting the Republicans at Rome as it was soon to fight them in the
East
. But the struggle was not purely political in cha
on, for the provinces of the West were exhausted, the revenues of the
East
in the hands of the Republicans. From Italy, ther
rutus and Cassius had been gathering the wealth and the armies of the
East
. Not long after the Battle of Mutina, Brutus depa
es of Lycia, the Caesarian cause had suffered complete eclipse in the
East
. Brutus and Cassius now took counsel for war. E
ncus, Brutus may not have abandoned all hope of an accommodation with
East
and West so evenly matched between Republicans an
ineteen legions and numerous levies from the dependent princes of the
East
. Wisdom after the event scores easy triumphs th
e settlement of the veterans, Antonius to regulate the affairs of the
East
and exact the requisite money. About the province
dishonesty or dispute. Antonius now departed to the provinces of the
East
, leaving to his young colleague the arduous and u
8 Velleius 2, 75. PageBook=>211 Still no sign came from the
East
. In Perusia the consul professed that he was figh
, 50, 212. PageBook=>213 approaching with an armament from the
East
, Antonius’ man Calenus still held all Gaul beyond
end of the summer, it was to find that Antonius had come up from the
East
and was laying siege to Brundisium, with Ahenobar
to be paid in two. Antonius distributed fines and privileges over the
East
, rewarded friends and punished enemies, set up pe
ses and his soldiers. His own share was the gathering of funds in the
East
in which perhaps he had not been very successful.
e fugitives were to return. To Antonius, now urgently needed in the
East
, the new compact appeared to bring an ally in the
th a formidable advantage. It waned with the years and absence in the
East
. Octavianus was able to win over more and more
the Euphrates, he superintended from Athens the reorganization of the
East
. The northern frontiers of Macedonia, ever expo
y of Rome had been restored. It remained to settle the affairs of the
East
upon an enduring basis and make war, for revenge,
an ambiguous partner he had to defer the complete pacification of the
East
. Caesar’s heir journeyed to the encounter, taking
is prestige were gravely menaced and there was work to be done in the
East
. Antonius departed for Syria. From Corcyra in the
must have been highly distasteful. His future and his fate lay in the
East
, with another woman. But that was not yet apparen
ome again to Brundisium or Tarentum with the fleets and armies of the
East
, whether it was peace or war in the end, Octavian
fight the wars of the Republic or of private ambition far away in the
East
; Octavianus chose to safeguard Italy. The victori
near future, should the Republicans and Pompeians come back from the
East
, should Antonius demand lands for the veterans of
hia was designed for the next summer. The dependent kingdoms of the
East
furnished the traditional basis of Roman economy
nd well- balanced structure, with every promise of long duration. 1
East
of the Hellespont there were to be three Roman pr
inding to his clientela all the kings, dynasts and cities of the wide
East
, had shown the way to imperial power. Beside prin
nces of blood or title, the personal following of Rome’s ruler in the
East
might suitably be extended to embrace the whole a
t enough to acquire the adherence of influential dynasts over all the
East
, friends of Rome and friends of Antonius. A ruler
yrus (IOSPE I2, 691), but mentioning other caesarian partisans in the
East
. for Theopompus and Callistus, cf. SIG3 761 and e
the pretext was the policy which had been adopted by Antonius in the
East
and the sinister intentions thence deduced and ma
y were, made no difference at all to provincial administration in the
East
. Yet even now Antonius’ acts and dispositions wer
bitions and narrow the area of its rule. Rome could not deal with the
East
as well as the West. The East was fundamentally d
my of empire. It was doubly necessary, now that Rome elsewhere in the
East
had undertaken a fresh commitment a new province,
gth of the Hellenistic monarchies. Rome spread confusion over all the
East
and in the end brought on herself wars foreign an
tortions of the knights. The empire, and especially the empire in the
East
, had been the ruin of the Republic. NotesPage=&
was making provision for the present, not for a long future, for the
East
but not for Italy and the West as well. 2 To abso
e West as well. 2 To absolute monarchy belonged divine honours in the
East
but not to monarchy alone: in any representative
ed from that of Antonius. The first man in Rome, when controlling the
East
, could not evade, even if he wished, the rank and
Antonius: she was planning a war of revenge that was to array all the
East
against Rome, establish herself as empress of the
ssumed the august and solemn form of a war of ideas and a war between
East
and West. Antonius and Cleopatra seem merely pawn
d a speech before the Senate, criticizing the acts of Antonius in the
East
. 1 Antonius replied with a manifesto. He took his
e more than enough to provide bounties or lands for the armies of the
East
. 4 Antonius consigned the statement of his acta
ted confirmation of his ordering of the provinces and kingdoms of the
East
. Ahenobarbus held back, perhaps in hope of peace.
Vestal Virgins. Neither the attack upon the policy of Antonius in the
East
, nor the indignation fomented about the divorce o
rary power and a national mandate to save Rome from the menace of the
East
. A kind of plebiscite was organized, in the form
lry of the Caesarian leaders a latent opposition between Rome and the
East
, and a nationalism grotesquely enhanced by war an
man imperator, wishing to secure ratification for his ordering of the
East
, was in himself no menace to the Empire, but a fu
s as before, rulers of a divided empire. The temporary severance of
East
and West between the two dynasts after the Pact o
s’ system of reducing the burdens of empire by delegating rule in the
East
to dependent princes diminished the profits of em
ness men leapt forward with alacrity to reconquer the kingdoms of the
East
and to seize a spoil so long denied, the rich lan
st ardent exponents of the national unity and the crusade against the
East
were no doubt to be found in the order of Roman k
f Roman history that in subsequent ages the division between West and
East
was masked so well and delayed so long. The loss
o an Italy that had prospered and grown rich from the revenues of the
East
, the return she gained from her export of soldier
f the imperial Republic had shattered and swept away the kings of the
East
, carrying the eagles in victory to the Euphrates
ing and artistic detail. More than that, Actium became the contest of
East
and West personified, the birth-legend in the myt
ter following the conqueror proceeded to make his dispositions in the
East
. The vassal princes, well aware of their own weak
ttach to his own clientela. 6 As heir to the power of Antonius in the
East
he confirmed their titles when he did not augment
considerably smaller than it had been after Pompeius’ ordering of the
East
, thirty years before. Precisely as in the system
Such was the sober truth about the much advertised reconquest of the
East
for Rome. 1 The artful conqueror preferred to lea
and not safely to be discarded in peace, was quietly neglected in the
East
, where he inherited the policy of Antonius in ord
god Divus Julius did not preclude the worship of the new lord of the
East
as well, manifest and monarchic. 2 The frontier
tern frontier policy of Antonius. His retreat from commitments in the
East
was unobtrusive and masterly. With the Mede, Anto
of Roman rule. There were to be no more civil wars. So much for the
East
. It was never a serious preoccupation to its conq
de M. Licinius Crassus (cos. 30 B.C.). 2 The other provinces of the
East
, not so important because they lacked permanent g
his Georgics during the War of Actium and Octavianus’ absence in the
East
. The Georgics published, he had already begun to
voke disquiet. When the Triumvir Antonius abode for long years in the
East
men might fear lest the city be dethroned from it
was enunciated in prose as well as in verse. 2 The conqueror of the
East
and hero of Actium must now gird himself to the a
sar the Dictator intended to spend three years in the Balkans and the
East
, not merely for warfare and for glory but that co
ly date possessed imperium maius over the senatorial provinces in the
East
has been argued, but cannot be proved. Nor can pr
ν ‘Ioνίoυ διάδoχoς Kαίσαρι. Against a grant of authority over all the
East
in 23 B.C. can be urged the fact that a few years
divide them. Before the end of the year he dispatched Agrippa to the
East
. An invasion of Arabia had failed, and the ill- a
nment. 3 Not only that. Syria was the only military province in the
East
except Egypt. Egypt might seem secure, governed b
osen for one who wished to keep watch over the Balkans as well as the
East
. 5 So much for the settlement of 23 B.C. It was
ran at Rome of dissension between the two. Agrippa’s departure to the
East
provoked various and inconsistent conjecture. In
a retired in disgust and resentment,6 in another his residence in the
East
is described as a mild but opprobrious form of ba
espite all the delegation to dependent princes or Greek cities in the
East
and autonomous municipalities in the West, the Em
too large for one man to rule it. Already the temporary severance of
East
and West in the years between the Pact of Brundis
vert the Principate into a partnership, devising a vicegerent for the
East
and perhaps for the western lands as well. Not on
war against Antonius. 2 The spoils of victory and the revenues of the
East
now revivified the economy of Italy. The speculat
lia Comata, the wealthy aristocracy of Asia and even the kings of the
East
would enter the imperial Senate, time and circums
to whose good offices Lucullus owed, it was said, his command in the
East
,1 found successors in the New State; and the free
pate the greater part was spent abroad, in Spain (27-24 B.C.,) in the
East
(22-19 B.C.) and again in Spain and Gaul (16-13 B
he East (22-19 B.C.) and again in Spain and Gaul (16-13 B.C.). In the
East
, prestige was his object, diplomacy his method. 3
e principem alibi quam Romae fieri. ’ 3 On policy and events in the
East
, cf. above all J. G. C. Anderson, CAH X, 239 ff.
partner in the government of the provinces. Agrippa was active in the
East
in 23-22 B.C., in the West in 20-19 B.C., when he
back at his work. After a sojourn of four years as vicegerent of the
East
, Agrippa came to Rome in 13 B.C., to find Augustu
o fall to Agrippa and the two Claudii. Agrippa on his return from the
East
went to Illyricum and fought a campaign in the wi
ver Augustus happened not to be, above all as vicegerent of the whole
East
; and he was intended to take supreme charge of th
departed in 13 B.C. M. Titius, who possessed a long experience of the
East
from his Antonian days, appears then to have been
as guide and counsellor to the young Gaius Caesar when he went to the
East
in 1 B.C.4 L. Calpurnius Piso (cos. 15 B.C.) is a
he Balkan lands called again for reinforcement from the armies of the
East
. In A.D. 7 Silvanus brought troops to the Balkans
re nobiles. These men all held high command in the provinces of the
East
with which, indeed, both Silvanus and Piso could
, had been proconsul of Macedonia. For the activity of Plautii in the
East
, cf. Münzer, RA, 43 f. On that family, cf. also b
gt;413 It was not intended that there should be foreign wars in the
East
. But the needs of West and North were urgent, org
n frontier and shortening the lines of communication between West and
East
, executed as an impressive example of converging
he crisis, were rather at a loss to explain Agrippa’s dispatch to the
East
. The gossip that so constantly asserted the prepo
y: he was now to depart from Rome and set in order the affairs of the
East
(no doubt with a special imperium). While Tiberiu
hardly been seen in Rome; and there was no urgent need of him in the
East
. Augustus wished to remove for a time this unbend
Ahenobarbus and Vinicius with the northern armies, of Lollius in the
East
and of Fabius Maximus in Spain. 6 The enemies o
m, after visiting the Danubian and Balkan armies, now appeared in the
East
. For some years disturbances in Armenia, a land o
yndicate of government since Agrippa the vicegerent departed from the
East
twelve years before. In the meantime, able men ha
Actium, but probably appointed legate of Syria when Agrippa left the
East
(13 B.C.,) C. Sentius Saturninus and P. Quinctili
1 f.; Dio 55, 10, 17 ff. (with no word of Lollius). For events in the
East
, cf. J. G. C. Anderson in CAH x, 273 ff. 2 Vell
wenty years later, that the task of controlling a crown prince in the
East
was peculiarly open to friction, dissension and p
e master:4 it is alleged that he asked for permission to dwell in the
East
in a private station. However it be (and scandal
as followed by Varus, with L. Nonius Asprenas as his legate. 5 In the
East
, L. Volusius Saturninus, a family friend of Tiber
to their rule nations more intractable than the conqueror of all the
East
had ever seen. In a surge of patriotic exaltation
he War of Actium could be shown as a sublime contest between West and
East
. Rome was not only a conqueror Rome was a protect
rge numbers. 3 There was less need for deception in the armies of the
East
. Galatians were regularly conscripted and given t
n to be a contest not so much against Greece as against Egypt and the
East
. The contest was perpetuated under the Principate
ertius 3, 11; 4, 6 (Actium); 2, 10; 3, 4 (conquest and revenge in the
East
). 2 Ib. 4, 11. 3 Amores 1, 9, 1. 4 Tacitus,
s to propagate the new faith was Herod the king of Judaea. 6 In the
East
, Roman citizens joined with Greeks in their worsh
latia. National memories were not strong in the western lands: in the
East
the fact that the Principate was a monarchy guara
stus, guarding the frontiers of empire in Africa, the Balkans and the
East
, suppressing brigandage, founding cities and prom
ir good behaviour. Disturbances broke out during his absence in the
East
a salutary reminder to the Senate. It was only fr
pon the laws. This was something different from the monarchies of the
East
. The Romans had not sunk as low as that. Complete
la praesens Italiae dominaeque Romae! 7 Greeks in the cities of the
East
hailed Augustus as the Saviour of the World, the
his influence and partisans, 384, 437 f., 505; with C. Caesar in the
East
, 428; his fall, 489, 509; his alleged virtues, 48
ons with Cleopatra, 214 f., 260 f., 273 ff., 281; organization of the
East
, 259 ff., 271 ff., 300 f.; invasion of Media, 263
t, 331 ff.; the new settlement, 333 ff.; acts in 22 B.C., 339; in the
East
, 371, 388; moral programme, 443 ff.; in Gaul and
44 B.C.), 57, 95; after the Ides of March, 101, 116 ff., 119; in the
East
, 124, 171 f., 177; campaign of Philippi, 203 ff.;
B.C., 97, 102, 107, 109; sets out for Syria, 124, 166; actions in the
East
, 171 f.; defeat and death, 203; his character, 69
490 f., 515, 522 f.; local, 82 f., 89, 91 f., 289, 292, 360 ff., etc.
East
, the, clientela of Pompeius in, 30, 74, 76, 261;
ius Caesar’s, 428. Economy, of Italy, impaired by the separation of
East
and West, 290; revived by the Principate, 351, 45
27; honours for, 417, 472, 474; betrothed to Julia Livia, 422; in the
East
, 428 f.; death, 430. Galatia, in the Triumviral
talici, 91 ff.; in the municipia, 89 ff.; in the West, 74 ff.; in the
East
, 262; his legates, 67, 94; secretariat, 71 f., 40
ficer in Egypt, 295. Julius Severus, C., Hadrianic senator from the
East
, 366. Julius Spartiaticus, C, Greek in imperial s
res of, 452 f. Religion, political use of, at Rome, 68, 256; in the
East
, 263, 273 f., 473 f.; religions, alien, 256, 448;
tribution of the Titulus Tiburtinus, 398 f.; with Gaius Caesar in the
East
, 429; loyal to Tiberius, 429, 434; his origin, 36
ional powers of, 337, 389; his position after 23 B.C., 345 f.; in the
East
, 338, 342, 371, 388 f.; in Spain, 333, 389, 457;